ArticlePalliative care and social practice2026
Communicating cancer diagnoses with children in Japan: A qualitative study of healthcare professionals' beliefs and approaches in pediatric oncology.
Article in Palliative care and social practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Most children with cancer want clear and honest information about their illness, and effective communication can support coping and reduce distress for children and families. However, in Japan, healthcare professionals face numerous communication barriers when discussing cancer diagnoses with children, and the culturally grounded beliefs and approaches shaping these conversations remain poorly understood. Objectives: This study was aimed at clarifying the beliefs and approaches of Japanese healthcare professionals in communicating cancer diagnoses to children and their families. Design: An exploratory qualitative design was adopted, involving semi-structured individual interviews. Methods: Participants included 18 healthcare professionals (9 physicians and 9 nurses) with over seven years of experience. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Five approaches were identified under an overarching commitment to the child's best interests: 1) honesty balanced with emotional protection, 2) empathetic negotiation with families, 3) information sharing to ensure understanding and hope, 4) being present in suffering, and 5) professional self-reflection and mutual team support. While these themes resonate with international literature on honest and supportive communication, two culturally salient features emerged in Japan: a strong tendency to prioritize families' wishes in decision making and a relational emphasis on "being present" rather than relying solely on structured, protocol-driven conversations. Communication was hampered by a lack of standardized training and a shortage of pediatric oncology nurses due to staff rotation. Conclusions: Pediatric cancer diagnosis communication in Japan is shaped by five approaches that prioritize the child's best interests. Locally grounded strategies highlight the importance of trust, relationship building, and being present, but may limit children's voices when family preferences dominate. It is essential to employ nurses who specialize in pediatric cancer care. Future research should incorporate the children's and families' perspectives and evaluate culturally sensitive communication strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.