Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403486›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Evaluation of an open-face 8-channel transmit 64-channel receive 7T head coil for neuroimaging.

Natasha E Fullerton, Belinda Ding, Sydney N Williams, Sarah Allwood-Spiers, Paul McElhinney, Divya Baskaran, Rosie Woodward, Tracey Hopkins, Evonne McLennan, Steven Winata and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Natasha E Fullerton *Imaging Centre of Excellence, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Belinda Ding *Siemens Healthcare Ltd., Camberley, United Kingdom.
Sydney N WilliamsImaging Centre of Excellence, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Sarah Allwood-SpiersDepartment of Clinical Physics and Bioengineering, National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Paul McElhinneyImaging Centre of Excellence, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Divya BaskaranImaging Centre of Excellence, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Rosie WoodwardClinical Research Imaging Facility, Research and Innovation, National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Tracey HopkinsClinical Research Imaging Facility, Research and Innovation, National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Evonne McLennanClinical Research Imaging Facility, Research and Innovation, National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Steven WinataImaging Centre of Excellence, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Janhavi GhosalkarImaging Centre of Excellence, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Hao GaoSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Graeme A KeithImaging Centre of Excellence, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Eva McEwanMR CoilTech Limited, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Nicolas BoulantUniversité Paris-Saclay, Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA), NeuroSpin, Gif Sur Yvette, France.
Paul DonnellyDepartment of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Laura PrestonDepartment of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Katy MacdonaldDepartment of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Ian M McLaughlinDepartment of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Russell OverendMR CoilTech Limited, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
David A PorterImaging Centre of Excellence, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Shajan GunamonyImaging Centre of Excellence, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Ultra-high field (UHF) 7 tesla (7T) MRI offers unique diagnostic opportunities for clinical neuroimaging. However, broader clinical implementation remains limited because the reduced radiofrequency (RF) wavelength at 7T causes RF transmit field ( Methods: An open-face eight-channel transmit 64-channel receive (8Tx64Rx) 7T head coil was developed with electrical and mechanical ergonomic features designed to improve usability and imaging homogeneity. The coil was evaluated in an in vivo validation study assessing ease of use, participant comfort, diagnostic value, and image quality using questionnaires and structured scoring sheets. Imaging performance of the 8Tx64Rx coil was compared with that of a commercially available regulatory approved 7T head coil featuring single transmit (sTx) and a 32-channel receive array. Diagnostic image quality acquired using circularly polarized (CP) mode and pTx mode was additionally assessed and compared. Results: The 8Tx64Rx coil demonstrated image quality that was equivalent or superior to the commercial 7T head coil across evaluated measures. In particular, improved signal homogeneity was achieved within the posterior fossa and temporal lobes. The coil also supported practical clinical use through favorable ergonomic performance and user comfort during scanning. Diagnostic image quality was enhanced when using pTx approaches compared with conventional transmit configurations. Discussion: The developed 8Tx64Rx 7T head coil demonstrates the potential to advance clinical neuroimaging at UHF by improving

Indexed as

64 channel receiver array7Tclinical MRIneuroimagingparallel-transmitradiofrequency head coilultra-high field MRIvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID42403486
PMCPMC13328354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.