ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
Acoustic stimulation in pain management: neurobiological mechanisms and clinical applications-a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain affects over 30% of the global population, with an underlying pathogenesis involving a complex interplay of biopsychosocial factors. Despite the availability of conventional pharmacological and interventional therapies, their clinical utility is frequently constrained by concerns regarding substance misuse, surgical complications, and other adverse sequelae. Acoustic stimulation (AS) has emerged as a promising alternative in pain management, characterized by its non-invasive nature, favorable safety profile, and high cost-effectiveness. However, current literature lacks a comprehensive evaluation of cutting-edge AS technologies and a profound decryption of its pleiotropic analgesic mechanisms, which has hindered the integration of AS into multimodal analgesic strategies. This review provides the first comprehensive synthesis of the neurobiological mechanisms and clinical applications of AS. We comprehensively evaluate the analgesic efficacy of diverse modalities, ranging from established interventions-such as music therapy (MT), natural sounds (NS)/noise, and auditory beat stimulation (ABS)-to emerging approaches, including vibroacoustic therapy (VAT) and immersive interactive technologies that integrate multisensory acoustic information. Emerging evidence suggests that AS exerts its therapeutic effects via a multidimensional neurobiological framework, notably through the modulation of corticothalamic circuits, the activation of descending pain-inhibitory systems, and the dynamic regulation of neurochemical mediators. Clinical data consistently highlight the adjunctive value of MT, NS/noise, and VAT in the management of both acute and chronic pain. Furthermore, the convergence of AS with immersive interactive technologies is pioneering a novel digital intervention paradigm, facilitating the seamless integration of AS into multimodal analgesic frameworks. Collectively, these findings suggest that AS represents a robust, non-pharmacological strategy that warrants further exploration as a cornerstone of future personalized, multimodal pain management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.