Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403400›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Biochar and compost amendments promote yield in specialty crops.

Gayatri Mishra, David Roger Gang, Anna Berim, Douglas Collins, Bertram T Jobson, Steven Seefeldt, Nathan Stacey, Neda Khosravi, Wendy Hoashi-Erhardt, Manuel Garcia-Perez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gayatri MishraInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
David Roger GangInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Anna BerimInstitute of Biological Chemistry, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States.
Douglas CollinsWSU Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources, WSU Puyallup Research and Extension Center, Puyallup, WA, United States.
Bertram T JobsonLaboratory for Atmospheric Research, WSU Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Pullman, WA, United States.
Steven SeefeldtWSU Northwest Research and Extension Center, Mt. Vernon, WA, United States.
Nathan StaceyWSU Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources, WSU Puyallup Research and Extension Center, Puyallup, WA, United States.
Neda KhosraviLaboratory for Atmospheric Research, WSU Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Pullman, WA, United States.
Wendy Hoashi-ErhardtWSU Puyallup Research and Extension Center, Puyallup, WA, United States.
Manuel Garcia-PerezBiological Systems Engineering, WSU Biological Systems Engineering, Pullman, WA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: There is growing evidence for the positive impact of compost and biochar as soil amendments. However, the effect observed has varied widely, depending on the crop species and the particular biochar formulation. Few studies have evaluated more than one crop × biochar-based amendment combination. Methods: To further address this question, we conducted a series of experiments with several crop species grown in the greenhouse and/or in the field, comparing the impact on crop yield and quality of several biochar-based soil amendments, including raw biochar, co-composted biochar, and biochar admixed with compost, using more than one compost type. Results: The incorporation of compost, co-composted biochar, and a combination of compost and biochar led to an enhancement in the productivity of sweet basil and strawberries. The effects differed according to the type of compost, biochar, and crop. Two basil cultivars and three composts amended with biochar were used in a greenhouse study. Specific combinations of particularly co-composted biochar led to increased biomass output compared to controls. The same amendments to the soil did not markedly influence the phytochemical content of sweet basil cultivated in either field or greenhouse, suggesting that the quality of the final product was unaffected. Co-composted biochar led to biomass increases for both basil cultivars in a field-based experiment, but the increases were not identical, suggesting a genetic component to the plant's response to the soil amendments. A strawberry experiment conducted in the greenhouse found that the average mass of single berries from plants grown with commercially produced compost plus 10% biochar was higher compared to several other treatments, particularly when it was co-composted. In a potato-based experiment, preliminary field trial data showed that co-compost amendments were the only amendment that increased potato crop production, but this was demonstrated only in fertilized split-plots. Discussion: Additional experiments will need to be conducted to evaluate the mechanisms responsible for the observed enhancement in yield for these various crop × biochar-based amendment combinations.

Indexed as

basilbiocharco-compostingmetabolitespotatoregenerativestrawberrysustainability

Identifiers

PMID42403400
PMCPMC13327866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.