ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Skin-to-skin contact in neonatal intensive care units: a narrative review of implementation challenges and strategies within infant- and family-centered care.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin-to-skin contact (SSC) is a key component of infant- and family-centered developmental care in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) and is associated with improved clinical and neurodevelopmental outcomes. However, SSC implementation in NICUs remains highly variable, often limited by perceived barriers and uncertainties regarding safety. This review aims to identify these barriers and summarize strategies to support the safe and consistent integration of SSC into routine neonatal care. Current evidence identifies barriers at multiple levels, including clinical factors (extreme prematurity, respiratory support, hemodynamic instability, maternal conditions), organizational constraints (lack of standardized protocols, limited staffing, variability in professional training), and emotional challenges (parental stress, insufficient guidance, and inconsistent support from healthcare professionals). Although concerns about safety-such as accidental device dislodgement or clinical instability-are frequently cited, current evidence does not support withholding SSC when appropriate monitoring, preparation, and positioning are ensured. Recent studies highlight that interventions like multidisciplinary professional training, simulation-based learning, institutional protocols, standardized safety checklists, algorithms for eligibility and structured parental education, are effective to reduce variability and support safe implementation of SSC. These interventions have been associated with increased SSC rates, improved parental engagement, and enhanced alignment with developmental care practices. Addressing these multilevel barriers is essential to promote the safe, equitable, and sustainable implementation of SSC across diverse neonatal care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.