Observational studyActa dermato-venereologica2026
Dupilumab in Difficult-to-treat Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Real-world Multicentre Cohort Study.
Observational study in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) remains difficult to manage in patients refractory to antihistamines and omalizumab. Although dupilumab has recently been approved and incorporated into international guidelines, real-world evidence remains limited, particularly in treatment-refractory populations. We conducted a multicentre ambispective cohort study across 16 Spanish hospitals including adults with CSU, with or without concomitant chronic inducible urticaria, treated with dupilumab and followed for ≥4 weeks. The primary outcome was well-controlled disease within 24 weeks (Urticaria Control Test ≥12 and Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days≤6). Fiftyone patients were included; 92.0% had previously received omalizumab. At week 24, 69.7% (23/33) achieved well-controlled disease and 39.4% (13/33) complete control. Among patients with available week-52 data, 90.5% (19/21) and 61.9% (13/21), respectively, achieved these outcomes. Concomitant therapy use declined from 94.1% at baseline to 55.6% at week 52. Among omalizumab-experienced patients evaluable at week 24, dupilumab response was lower in prior nonresponders than in those with at least partial response to omalizumab (40% vs 85%, p=0.011). Atopic comorbidities were associated with greater UAS7 reduction (p=0.018). Dupilumab was well tolerated, with mostly mild adverse events. In routine clinical practice, dupilumab provides effective disease control in patients with difficult-totreat CSU, including most omalizumab-experienced individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.