Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403314›Full record

Observational studyActa dermato-venereologica2026

Dupilumab in Difficult-to-treat Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Real-world Multicentre Cohort Study.

Nidia Planella-Fontanillas, Emilio Berna-Rico, Ignasi Figueras-Nart, Jorge Spertino, Lluís Dols Casanova, María Elena Gatica Ortega, Vicente Expósito-Serrano, Miguel Antonio Lasheras Pérez, Mercedes Rodríguez Serna, José M Mascaró and 14 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Nidia Planella-FontanillasDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Medicine and Life Sciences Department (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0009-0007-1303-2422
Emilio Berna-RicoDermatology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain.
Ignasi Figueras-NartDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Jorge SpertinoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Lluís Dols CasanovaDepartment of Dermatology, Alicante University General Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research (ISABIAL), Alicante, Spain.
María Elena Gatica OrtegaDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
Vicente Expósito-SerranoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, Barcelona, Spain.
Miguel Antonio Lasheras PérezDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Mercedes Rodríguez SernaDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
José M MascaróDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Gemma Melé-NinotDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari Sagrat Cor, Grupo Quirónsalud, Barcelona, Spain.
Pedro Mercader-GarcíaDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain.
Francisco José Navarro TriviñoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Unidad de Eczema de contacto e Inmunoalergia cutánea, Granada, Spain.
Fátima Tous RomeroDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Elosua-GonzálezDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Jorge Magdaleno-TapialDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Amparo Pérez FerriolsDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Trinidad Montero-VilchezDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain; Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADA, Granada, Spain.
José Ignacio Torné GutiérrezDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Son Llàtzer, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.
Fernando GallardoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Medicine and Life Sciences Department (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
David PesquéDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Medicine and Life Sciences Department (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Ramon M PujolDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Medicine and Life Sciences Department (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.
Esther Serra-BaldrichDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Ana M Giménez-ArnauDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Medicine and Life Sciences Department (MELIS), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5434-7753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) remains difficult to manage in patients refractory to antihistamines and omalizumab. Although dupilumab has recently been approved and incorporated into international guidelines, real-world evidence remains limited, particularly in treatment-refractory populations. We conducted a multicentre ambispective cohort study across 16 Spanish hospitals including adults with CSU, with or without concomitant chronic inducible urticaria, treated with dupilumab and followed for ≥4 weeks. The primary outcome was well-controlled disease within 24 weeks (Urticaria Control Test ≥12 and Urticaria Activity Score over 7 days≤6). Fiftyone patients were included; 92.0% had previously received omalizumab. At week 24, 69.7% (23/33) achieved well-controlled disease and 39.4% (13/33) complete control. Among patients with available week-52 data, 90.5% (19/21) and 61.9% (13/21), respectively, achieved these outcomes. Concomitant therapy use declined from 94.1% at baseline to 55.6% at week 52. Among omalizumab-experienced patients evaluable at week 24, dupilumab response was lower in prior nonresponders than in those with at least partial response to omalizumab (40% vs 85%, p=0.011). Atopic comorbidities were associated with greater UAS7 reduction (p=0.018). Dupilumab was well tolerated, with mostly mild adverse events. In routine clinical practice, dupilumab provides effective disease control in patients with difficult-totreat CSU, including most omalizumab-experienced individuals.

Indexed as

Anti-Allergic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChronic UrticariaAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOmalizumabRemission InductionSpainTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Allergic AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizeddupilumabOmalizumab

Identifiers

PMID42403314
PMCPMC13334162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.