Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42403290›Full record

ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2026

Real-World Performance and Mid-Term Durability of the Myval Transcatheter Heart Valve in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Alberto Colella Cervone, Dimytri Alexandre de Alvim Siqueira, Tacianne Rolemberg Braga Delamain, Jose Henrique Herrmann Delamain, Sergio Luiz Navarro Braga, Jorge Eduardo Assef, Ibraim Masciarelli Francisco Pinto, Mario Issa, Dorival Julio Della Togna, A Tito Paladino and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Alberto Colella CervoneInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6887-1169
Dimytri Alexandre de Alvim SiqueiraInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4903-5274
Tacianne Rolemberg Braga DelamainInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Jose Henrique Herrmann DelamainInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Sergio Luiz Navarro BragaInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Jorge Eduardo AssefInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ibraim Masciarelli Francisco PintoInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Mario IssaInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Dorival Julio Della TognaInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
A Tito PaladinoInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Fernando TanajuraInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Louis Nakayama OheInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Ricardo Alves da CostaInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Gabriel Prado SaadInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Matheus Oliveira SouzaInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Lucas Ferreira Marcondes LemosInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Gustavo Sabino Ferreira BandeiraInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Lucas DamianiInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Kleber G FranchiniInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Fausto FeresInterventional Cardiology Department, Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Myval Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) was designed to address limitations of earlier devices, such as paravalvular leak and sizing restrictions. The LANDMARK trial showed non-inferior short-term outcomes versus established valves in a randomized population of patients with severe aortic stenosis eligible for TAVR with the compared devices. However, confirmation of these findings in routine clinical practice remains important. This study evaluates the real-world safety, efficacy, and mid-term durability of Myval in severe aortic stenosis.

aimsThis study evaluates the real-world safety, efficacy, and mid-term durability of the Myval THV in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR in a consecutive single-center registry.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective, single-center, single-arm study including 214 consecutive patients who underwent Myval THV implantation between December 2020 and February 2025, with at least 30-day follow-up. Clinical events were reported as incidence rates per 100 patient-years, and hemodynamic performance was assessed using mean profile charts with 95% confidence intervals.

resultsAmong 214 patients (mean age 77 years; 41% female), procedural success was 97.7%. Aortic valve area increased from 0.68 cm

conclusionIn this real-world cohort, TAVR with the Myval THV showed high procedural success, sustained mid-term hemodynamic improvement, and complication rates comparable to benchmark devices. These findings support its potential as a safe and effective option for severe aortic stenosis, although confirmation in larger, multicentre studies with extended follow-up is warranted.

Indexed as

Aortic ValveAortic Valve StenosisHeart Valve ProsthesisTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMalePostoperative ComplicationsProsthesis DesignRecovery of FunctionRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentaortic stenosishaemodynamic performanceMyval THVreal‐world outcomesTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplaceMent (TAVR)valve durability

Identifiers

PMID42403290
PMCPMC13532515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.