ReviewClinical and translational medicine2026
Artificial intelligence and oral microbiome: Reshaping the diagnostic and therapeutic paradigm of OSCC.
Review in Clinical and translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) remains a major clinical challenge, with delayed diagnosis, frequent resistance to therapy, and poor long-term survival.
methodsThis review systematically evaluates the methodological framework for applying AI to oral microbiome data in OSCC. Emerging paradigms, including self-supervised learning for leveraging unlabelled data and explainable AI (XAI) techniques for model interpretability, are also discussed. Model evaluation relies on cross-validation, hyperparameter optimisation, and performance metrics such as AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score.
resultsMultiple studies demonstrate that AI-based classifiers, especially random forest models built on salivary or tissue-derived microbial features, achieve outstanding discrimination between OSCC patients and healthy controls in retrospective, single-centre cohorts, with reported AUC values exceeding 0.99 and accuracy >95%. However, these exceptional metrics should be interpreted with caution, as they are susceptible to cohort size, sampling site heterogeneity, batch effects, feature-selection bias, and the absence of independent external validation. Beyond binary diagnosis, AI has been successfully applied to predict lymph node metastasis, explore tumour metabolic reprogramming, and assess environmental interactions. Integrated multi-omics approaches further enhance the specificity and clinical relevance of microbial biomarkers.
conclusionsThe convergence of AI and oral microbiome analysis is reshaping the diagnostic and therapeutic landscape of OSCC, and explore microbiome-targeted combination therapies. Addressing these challenges will be pivotal to realising truly intelligent, personalised management and ultimately improving outcomes for OSCC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.