ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Segmentally Duplicated Regulatory Elements Undergo Human-Specific Rewiring.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomes From 117 Vertebrate Species Reveal Rapidly Evolving Segmental-Duplication Landscapes.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene regulatory innovation underlies many phenotypic transitions. Transposable elements are an established mechanism for creating families of cis-acting elements with shared sequence features and the potential to establish co-regulatory networks. To understand additional mechanisms by which co-regulatory networks form, we define families of noncoding elements based on sequence similarity and cell type-specific activity. We apply this analysis framework to the human telomere-to-telomere genome assembly and embryonic stem cell chromatin accessibility data. We identify segmental duplications as the major mechanism establishing these families, creating over one thousand networks of elements with open chromatin in embryonic stem cells. We functionally validate a subset of these networks as families of regulatory elements with STARR-seq and identify their target genes with CRISPRi in embryonic stem cells. Following segmental duplication, we find that regulatory elements at times maintain their relationship to target genes, and at times rewire to form novel connections. During this rewiring, we observe proximal-acting elements gaining the ability to regulate distally-located genes and observe transcriptional enhancers rewiring to regulate genes present at the locus outside the segmental duplication. Many of these rewiring events are human specific. Finally, we find that segmental duplications have made outsized contributions to expanding regulatory element families functioning in immune cell types and specific brain regions, including the posterior cingulate gyrus. We speculate that placing regulatory elements in new genomic contexts primes regulatory elements for neofunctionalization, and that regulatory rewiring after segmental duplication was a common mechanism underlying gene regulatory change during human evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.