Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42402815›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2026

Contextualising, Conceptualising and Constructing At-Homeness: Towards an Integrative Framework for Residential Care.

Jialiang Cui, Jialing Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jialiang CuiDepartment of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-8708-1947
Jialing WuDepartment of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.

Funding

Chinese University of Hong KongResearch Grants Council, University Grants Committee 24619023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of at-homeness has been increasingly adopted in residential care to describe a metaphorical sense of being "at home". Within a sector often criticised for displacing residents from familiar environments, at-homeness has come to symbolise the ideal experiential outcome of care. Yet, despite a growing body of work enriching our understanding of what at-homeness entails, existing conceptualisations tend to overlook the processes through which at-homeness is personally and multiply constructed and are shaped predominantly by studies of older adults in long-term care contexts. To address these limitations, a qualitative study, employing a user-involved approach, was conducted in Hong Kong, incorporating in-depth interviews with 60 residents of mental health residential services and ethnographic observations across three hostels. Analysis shows that at-homeness is shaped through boundary-setting and bonding between the self and three arenas-social relations ("people"), material environments and temporal orientations. Residents interpreted core qualities of at-homeness across personal, relational, material and temporal dimensions and their constructions were guided by distinct logics involving self-appraisal, temporal integration, relational attunement and socio-cultural grounding. The study proposes an integrative framework that reframes at-homeness as a dynamic, negotiated process, offering new insights for advancing theory and strengthening methodological and practice approaches in residential care.

Indexed as

Home EnvironmentResidential FacilitiesAgedAged, 80 and overAnthropology, CulturalFemaleHong KongHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID42402815
PMCPMC13333906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.