ArticleExperimental physiology2026
Very low-amplitude muscle activity increases probability of motor evoked potentials in healthy individuals and in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- When is a muscle at rest? The problem of background activity in brain stimulation.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Very low-amplitude muscle activity increases probability of motor evoked potentials in healthy individuals and in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- A method of compensating for the excitability of spinal motoneurones when estimating the magnitude of potentials evoked in skeletal muscles.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Muscle contraction increases motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude, decreasing motor threshold (MT). Correspondingly, trials where baseline EMG amplitude exceeds a specified threshold are often rejected. We aimed to investigate the influence of motor activity below such a threshold of MEP amplitude. We retrospectively analysed TMS-EMG data collected during resting MT (RMT) measurement in 45 healthy control subjects (1794 data points) and 35 people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS; 1229 data points). Trials with de-meaned root mean squared (RMS) EMG amplitude of >10 µV throughout the 200 ms prior to stimulation were rejected. Generalised linear mixed-effects models assessed effects of muscle activity below this rejection threshold on the probability of evoking an MEP with peak-to-peak amplitude of ≥50 µV. Greater sub-rejection-threshold activity significantly increases MEP probability in control subjects and people with ALS. Models predicted a 38%-43% increase in MEP probability when baseline RMS-EMG amplitude increased from
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.