ArticleJournal of viral hepatitis2026
Monitoring of the Cascade of Care in Patients With Chronic HBV in Primary Care Clinics in Australia.
Article in Journal of viral hepatitis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To achieve hepatitis B virus (HBV) elimination in Australia, a shift from hospital to community-based care is needed. This study aimed to describe the prevalence of chronic HBV and uptake of the cascade of care in primary care patients. This prospective cohort study was conducted in 76 urban and regional primary care clinics across Victoria, Australia between 1/7/2020 and 30/6/2023. Anonymised socio-demographic, clinical and laboratory data from general practice (GP) clinics' electronic medical records (EMR) were extracted. Descriptive analysis of the cohort of clinic clients with HBV was performed. A total of 346,927 individuals attended appointments across the study period. Of these, 25,212 had records indicating HBV-related testing. 491 (0.14%) individuals had evidence of current HBV infection defined as HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and/or HBV DNA positive. 469 attended the clinics during the study period, among whom 239 (51%) were female. In the GP EMR, only 59 (13%) had evidence of at least one HBV DNA test and at least one ALT test ordered. Fourteen patients (3%) had record of being reviewed for HBV management by the clinic nurse or GP and 78 (17%) reviewed by a viral hepatitis specialist. Ninety-two (20%) were on treatment for HBV. Of people receiving treatment, 23 (25%) had a record of linkage to specialist care. Our data show that significant gaps in the cascade of care remain for people with chronic HBV in primary care settings, with a low proportion of patients having evidence of participating in all stages of the HBV cascade of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.