ArticleColorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland2026
Prognostic impact of anal cancer morphology on survival and local recurrence: A 20-year regional cohort study.
Article in Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local recurrence or treatment failure? Interpreting the prognostic effect of anal cancer morphology.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- Tumour morphology as a visible readout of cancer biology: Towards artificial intelligence-enabled multimodal risk stratification in anal squamous cell carcinoma.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe relationship between macroscopic tumour morphology and clinical outcomes has previously been demonstrated for malignant melanoma and gastric cancers, but not for anal squamous cell cancer (ASCC). This study investigated the effect of the morphology of ASCC on oncological outcomes.
methodsThe morphology of all ASCC patients presenting between 2003 and 2022 was analysed retrospectively and classified as Exophytic, Ulcerated or Mixed. The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were complete response to treatment, local recurrence (LR) and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS).
resultsOf 622 patients referred to the anal MDT, 515 were included for analysis: 290 exophytic, 179 ulcerated and 46 mixed morphology. Ulcerated morphology was associated with a significantly lower percentage of patients surviving at 5 years compared to exophytic and mixed groups (25.1% vs. 67.9% vs. 65.2% p < 0.001). Ulcerated and mixed morphology patients presented with significantly larger tumours (T4- 30.7% vs. 28.3% vs. 10.0% p < 0.001) and greater nodal involvement (N2- 26.3% vs. 17.2% vs. 15.2% p = 0.042). Exophytic morphology patients had significantly greater complete response at 95.9%, compared to 82.6% for mixed and 45.8% for ulcerated tumours (p < 0.001). Morphology remained significant in both univariable and multivariable Cox regression models across 5-year OS, DFS and LR. Ulcerated [HR 5.160 (3.338-7.979) p < 0.001] and mixed morphology [HR 2.299 (1.179-4.482) p = 0.015] had significantly worse risk of 5-year overall survival compared to exophytic morphology.
conclusionUlcerated morphology is associated with advanced tumours, poor response to chemoradiotherapy, resulting in a higher incidence of recurrent disease and worse overall- and disease-free survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.