Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42402736›Full record

ReviewRomanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie

Cleft lip∕palate. From embryology to developmental pathogenesis.

Marcello Guarino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologie. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marcello GuarinoDepartment of Anatomical Pathology, Hospital of Vimercate, Italy; marcello.guarino@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cleft of the lip associated with or unassociated with cleft of the palate and cleft palate (CLP) represent frequent birth defects, and the mechanisms by which they occur are not completely clear. On the other hand, knowledge of the normal mechanisms underlying lip development and palatogenesis is still incomplete, and therefore a better understanding and consolidation of our knowledge in this field could help to study these deformities. Upper lip and secondary palate formation are complex processes, involving the subtle integration of several biological events, the disruption of which causes the clefting phenotype. Indeed, these developmental events imply a series of morphogenetic changes involving concerted cell survival, migration, growth, pattern generation, modulation of adhesiveness, death and differentiation. In recent years, genetically engineered animal models and in vitro palate cultures have greatly advanced our knowledge of the cellular and molecular pathways underlying normal orofacial morphogenesis, and abnormally developed CLP as well. Indeed, most of the morphogenetic events of craniofacial development are highly conserved amongst vertebrates, therefore animal models have revealed major insights into the mechanisms that take place in human orofacial development. Given their complexity, it is easy to imagine that the failure of the highly coordinated processes that guide the union of the lip and palate causes various forms of clefts. This article provides an overview of the embryological development of the lip and secondary palate, as well as the mechanisms underlying deviant development resulting in CLP, concentrating on the cellular and molecular characteristics.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalatePalateAnimalsHumansbiological basesmorphogenesis of the liporofacial cleftspalatogenesispathogenesis

Identifiers

PMID42402736
PMCPMC13603011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.