Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42402627›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Mentalization of shame in coping with self-coherence dysregulation during shame experiences.

Samira Rostami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Samira RostamiEducational Psychology, University of Shiraz, Shiraz, Iran. S.rostamipsy@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionShame is a fundamental self-conscious emotion that can disrupt self-narratives and identity coherence. This study explored how mentalization moderates the impact of shameful memories on self-narrative organization.

methodsA qualitative design using thematic narrative analysis was employed. Six participants with significant experiences of shame were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected via semi-structured narrative interviews, transcribed, and analyzed using MAXQDA. Trustworthiness was ensured through prolonged engagement.

resultsFindings showed that shame often leads to collapse of self-narratives, reduced agency, and regression to pre-mentalizing states. Resolution occurs through activation of mentalization, allowing symbolic distancing from emotion, narrative reconstruction, adaptive coping, and restored identity coherence.

conclusionMentalization enables adaptive processing of shame, transforming existential threat into an opportunity for self-redefinition and coherent narrative identity. Enhancing mentalization may support clinical interventions for shame-related disturbances.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalMentalizationSelf ConceptSense of CoherenceShameAdultCoping SkillsFemaleHumansMaleNarrationQualitative ResearchMentalizationNarrative analysisSelf-coherenceShame

Identifiers

PMID42402627
PMCPMC13613662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.