ArticleConflict and health2026
Violence against health care workers in a post-conflict context: an exploratory qualitative study in the province of South Kivu, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo.
Article in Conflict and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundViolence against healthcare is a significant public health issue worldwide, yet it remains poorly documented in resource-limited countries, especially in sub-Saharan Africa. This study aims to explore the causes of such violence, types, perpetrators, consequences and mechanisms for its prevention within the post-conflict context of the South Kivu province in eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC).
methodsThis exploratory qualitative study was conducted from April to May 2022 in the health zones (HZ) of Kamituga, Katana and Walungu. A diverse group of participants, including health system stakeholders, community members and policy makers were interviewed, through Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and key informant interviews (KII), guided by a pre-established interview guide. A deductive thematic analysis was carried out and the verbatim quotes were used to illustrate the respondents' comments.
resultsA total of 143 participants were interviewed for this study. The types of violence reported included physical, verbal and psychological abuse, threats through communication channels and economic abuse (misappropriation of funds, unpaid discharge). The identified causes included interpersonal dynamics within the healthcare staff and between staff and patients, cultural influences and systemic organisational issues. Aggressors varied, spanning from patients and their companions, to the healthcare workers themselves, alongside political, administrative and customary authorities. The violence has far-reaching negative consequences, affecting the individual health care workers, their colleagues and the overall quality of healthcare delivery. Pre-existing warning and prevention mechanisms include recourse to the hierarchy, silence, the utilization of suggestion boxes, regular meetings at the Central Zone Office and supervisory measures.
conclusionsViolence against healthcare professionals is a well-known but poorly documented issue that affects both their wellbeing and professional performance. Integrated health system reforms addressing accountability, governance, and working conditions are needed to prevent violence against healthcare workers, with engagement of political authorities essential for developing and implementing effective prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.