ArticleBMC public health2026
Multinational cohort study of health perception mismatch trajectories and risks of cognitive decline, depression, and mortality.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHealth perception mismatch is common in older adults, yet its longitudinal patterns and prognostic value remain unclear. This study aimed to identify distinct mismatch trajectories and their associations with depression, cognitive decline, and mortality.
methodsData from three longitudinal ageing cohorts-the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), and Health and Retirement Study (HRS)-were used to identify health perception mismatch trajectories and evaluate their associations with depression, cognitive impairment, and mortality. Baseline SRH-ADL/IADL interplay was examined within these longitudinal cohorts, while the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) was retained as an independent external cross-sectional comparison. Associations were evaluated using multivariable regression, structural equation modeling, inverse probability of treatment weighting, causal forests, random-effects meta-analysis, and counterfactual prediction.
findingsBaseline analyses in CHARLS, ELSA, and HRS showed heterogeneous and generally modest SRH-ADL/IADL additive interaction estimates, while NHANES provided an independent external cross-sectional comparison. Three stable perception mismatch trajectories, Mildly pessimistic, Mildly optimistic, and Highly optimistic, were consistently identified across CHARLS, ELSA, and HRS. Despite reporting better SRH, individuals in the Highly optimistic group had poorer baseline health and higher subsequent risks of depression, cognitive decline, and mortality. Counterfactual prediction analyses indicated 13-18% differences in mortality and depression risk between hypothetical trajectory contrasts, with the largest differences observed between the mildly pessimistic and highly optimistic classes, suggesting that discordantly favorable SRH may mark elevated risk.
interpretationHealth perception mismatch trajectories may help identify older adults at elevated health risk. Discordantly optimistic perceptions may mark underlying vulnerability, suggesting that combining subjective and objective assessments could complement existing approaches to risk stratification. However, these observational findings do not establish that modifying health perceptions or trajectory membership would alter subsequent outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.