SynthesisBMC cancer2026
Genomic landscape of triple-negative breast cancer in South Asian populations: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive breast cancer subtype defined by the absence of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 expression, and is associated with limited targeted treatment options and poor clinical outcomes. Although major genomic studies have characterized TNBC in Western populations, the genomic landscape of TNBC in South Asian populations remains insufficiently understood despite a relatively high disease burden in this region. We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidance to synthesize available genomic evidence on TNBC in South Asian cohorts. Studies reporting genomic alterations in TNBC patients from South Asia were identified through searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest, supplemented by citation tracking and a ClinicalTrials.gov search. Eight studies from India and Pakistan met the eligibility criteria. Because the evidence base was sparse and clinically and methodologically heterogeneous, and because the number of studies reporting extractable denominators for any single biomarker did not reach our pre-specified threshold for pooling, data were synthesized descriptively rather than by meta-analysis. Across the included studies, recurrent alterations were reported in key tumor-suppressor and DNA-repair genes, particularly BRCA1, BRCA2, and TP53. Germline BRCA1 alterations were reported at a relatively high frequency in several cohorts, most notably in Pakistani TNBC patients, suggesting a contribution of hereditary DNA-repair defects to TNBC pathogenesis in this population. These findings highlight the importance of population-specific genomic analyses and support the growing role of DNA-repair-directed therapies and biomarker-driven precision oncology strategies in TNBC management. We additionally propose, as recommendations for future work, a two-tier framework for ancestry classification and a tiered scheme for harmonizing homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42402565What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.