ArticleClinical rheumatology2026
A pilot educational intervention to improve knowledge and readiness for self-management among patients with rheumatic diseases in Uganda.
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/
objectivesRheumatic diseases pose a significant challenge in Uganda, where access to care is limited. Patient self-management is an effective strategy for improving health outcomes. In collaboration with The Arthritis Association of Uganda (TAAU), a patient-led organization, we developed and piloted a virtual patient education series to support self-management. We hypothesized that it would be feasible and acceptable, and that we could collect measures regarding readiness for self-management and disease-related knowledge.
methodsWith input from TAAU, four sessions were developed: Introduction to Arthritis, Exercise & Nutrition, Women's Health & Rheumatic Disease, and Understanding My Disease & Rheumatology Medications. Adults receiving care at Mulago Hospital Rheumatology Clinic were invited to participate, and completed surveys assessing demographics, pre- and post-session self-management readiness via the Patient Activation Measure® (PAM®) and knowledge. Feasibility metrics were analyzed descriptively. Pre-post measures were evaluated using t-tests.
resultsOn average, 21 participants attended each session (48 ± 14 years, 64% women). Diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, lupus, and psoriatic arthritis. 33 enrollment and 41 Exit Surveys were collected. Most participants reported finding the sessions useful and the virtual format acceptable. Challenges included language barriers, internet connectivity, loss of hardcopy surveys, and weather-related delays. Mean PAM® levels increased from 2.2 to 2.9 (p < 0.001). Knowledge scores also improved across sessions (0.95 to 2.24 out of 4, p < 0.001).
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility and potential for virtual education to improve self-management and knowledge among patients with rheumatic diseases in Uganda. Future studies should address logistical challenges and assess long-term impacts. Key Points • A virtual patient education series focused on self-management, developed with patient input, was feasibility and acceptably implemented in a low-resource rheumatology clinic setting. • Measures regarding patient activation (readiness) for self-management and disease-related knowledge were successfully collected and preliminarily demonstrated improvement after the educational sessions. • Identified logistical challenges will help guide the future scale-up of self-management support interventions for patients with rheumatic disease in Uganda and similar low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42402544What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.