ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2026
Genomic insights into the probiotic potential of dairy-associated Saccharomyces cerevisiae WUT3 and WUT151 strains.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the prevalence of bacterial probiotics, yeast-based preparations offer unique therapeutic benefits that remain a key research priority. Here, we conducted a comparative genomic characterization of the dairy-associated Saccharomyces cerevisiae WUT3 and WUT151 strains, building on previous evidence showing their enhanced probiotic potential relative to the probiotic S. cerevisiae var. boulardii CNCM I-745. The genomes of WUT3 and WUT151 were compared with the reference S. cerevisiae S288C and the probiotic S. boulardii CNCM I-745. At the CDS level, both WUT strains were closer to S288C, suggesting that their probiotic properties stem from unique mechanisms rather than general genetic similarities to the probiotic strain. WUTs shared selected probiotic-related features, including ENA1 deletions, WHI2 alterations, and loss of Ty1/Ty2 regions present in S288C. Together with conserved core stress-response genes, this profile supports their tolerance to low pH, bile salts, and elevated temperature. Gene content analysis revealed redundancy within the hexose transporters and confirmed the absence of the ASP3 cluster. Indels in HSP150 and PIR3 may reflect WUT and S. boulardii cell wall variations. Overall, the probiotic potential of WUT strains does not originate from a single 'probiotic genome', but rather from a unique combination of traits dispersed throughout the S. cerevisiae species. Since no detrimental features were revealed in the analyzed genomes, these strains represent promising candidates for further clinical evaluation. Furthermore, these findings demonstrate that integrative genomic analysis is an effective strategy for the identification, selection, and characterization of candidate probiotic yeast strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.