ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Cross-domain transfer learning from peptides to metabolites using a multi-property fine-tuned LLM.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAccurate liquid chromatography retention time (RT) prediction is a critical component of compound identification in metabolomics and lipidomics. However, existing RT prediction approaches are often limited by the scarcity of experimental RT measurements for many molecular classes, restricting model generalization and the construction of comprehensive RT libraries. Transfer learning from data-rich chemical domains offers a potential strategy to overcome these limitations, but its effectiveness for metabolite RT prediction remains insufficiently explored.
resultsWe developed a transfer learning framework based on ChemBERTa that leverages large peptide datasets to improve metabolite RT prediction under data-sparse conditions. A peptide-pretrained model was trained using a multi-task objective that jointly predicted RT and seven RDKit-derived molecular descriptors. Compared with an RT-only model, the multi-task approach learned more robust chemical representations and demonstrated superior generalization to metabolites, achieving a median test R² of 0.842 versus 0.820. When transferred to metabolite RT prediction, the multi-task pretrained model substantially outperformed models trained from scratch at low-data regimes. Using only 3% of metabolite training data (2129 compounds), transfer learning achieved a median test R² of 0.322 compared with 0.216 for the baseline model, while reducing MAE from 131.7 to 114.9. Significant improvements were also observed at 5% and 10% training fractions, with benefits gradually diminishing as larger metabolite datasets became available. In contrast, a peptide-pretrained single-task RT model showed performance comparable to the baseline, indicating that the observed gains arise primarily from multi-task molecular property learning rather than peptide pretraining alone. These findings demonstrate that multi-task transfer learning provides an effective and scalable strategy for improving RT prediction in metabolomics, particularly when experimental training data are limited. AVAILABILITY: Freely available on https://github.com/uchealex/CHEMBEDDING.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.