Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42402205›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Cross-domain transfer learning from peptides to metabolites using a multi-property fine-tuned LLM.

Uchenna Alex Anyaegbunam, David Teschner, Thierry Schmidlin, Andreas Hildebrandt, Johannes U Mayer, Maximilian Sprang, Miguel A Andrade-Navarro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Uchenna Alex AnyaegbunamComputational Biology and Data Mining group (CBDM), Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iOME), Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 55128, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-5732-8103
David TeschnerInstitute of Computer Science, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1755-5382
Thierry SchmidlinInstitute of Immunology, University Medical Center of the Johannes-Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, 55131, Germany.
Andreas HildebrandtInstitute of Computer Science, Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, 55128, Germany.
Johannes U MayerInstitute for Quantitative and Computational Biosciences (IQCB), Johannes-Gutenberg University, Mainz, 55128, Germany.
Maximilian SprangComputational Biology and Data Mining group (CBDM), Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iOME), Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8438-4747
Miguel A Andrade-NavarroComputational Biology and Data Mining group (CBDM), Institute of Organismic and Molecular Evolution (iOME), Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, 55128, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6650-1711

Funding

diAMs 03ZU1202ECDIASyMEinstein Early Career ResearcherFederal Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF): curATime 03ZU1202ABForschungskernen für Massenspektrometrie in der Systemmedizin (MSCoreSys)ReALity Initiative of the Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz and the Forschungsinitiative des Landes Rheinland-Pfalz
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAccurate liquid chromatography retention time (RT) prediction is a critical component of compound identification in metabolomics and lipidomics. However, existing RT prediction approaches are often limited by the scarcity of experimental RT measurements for many molecular classes, restricting model generalization and the construction of comprehensive RT libraries. Transfer learning from data-rich chemical domains offers a potential strategy to overcome these limitations, but its effectiveness for metabolite RT prediction remains insufficiently explored.

resultsWe developed a transfer learning framework based on ChemBERTa that leverages large peptide datasets to improve metabolite RT prediction under data-sparse conditions. A peptide-pretrained model was trained using a multi-task objective that jointly predicted RT and seven RDKit-derived molecular descriptors. Compared with an RT-only model, the multi-task approach learned more robust chemical representations and demonstrated superior generalization to metabolites, achieving a median test R² of 0.842 versus 0.820. When transferred to metabolite RT prediction, the multi-task pretrained model substantially outperformed models trained from scratch at low-data regimes. Using only 3% of metabolite training data (2129 compounds), transfer learning achieved a median test R² of 0.322 compared with 0.216 for the baseline model, while reducing MAE from 131.7 to 114.9. Significant improvements were also observed at 5% and 10% training fractions, with benefits gradually diminishing as larger metabolite datasets became available. In contrast, a peptide-pretrained single-task RT model showed performance comparable to the baseline, indicating that the observed gains arise primarily from multi-task molecular property learning rather than peptide pretraining alone. These findings demonstrate that multi-task transfer learning provides an effective and scalable strategy for improving RT prediction in metabolomics, particularly when experimental training data are limited. AVAILABILITY: Freely available on https://github.com/uchealex/CHEMBEDDING.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsPeptidesChromatography, LiquidLarge Language ModelsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID42402205
PMCPMC13375263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.