ArticleHealth economics2026
Healthcare Costs Following Medical Gender-Affirmation: Evidence From Whole-of-Population Australian Administrative Data.
Article in Health economics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- All-cause and cause-specific mortality among transgender and gender diverse people: a nationwide cohort study in Australia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2026Article
- Mental health treatment among transgender and gender diverse people following gender affirming hormone therapy: evidence from whole-of-population Australian administrative data.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gender incongruence in trans and nonbinary ("trans") populations is often associated with psychological distress and increased demand for mental healthcare. Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is a key component of care for many trans people, yet long-term evidence around its cost implications remains limited despite increasing uptake and policy attention worldwide. We provide the first population-based evidence on the healthcare costs of GAHT initiation using longitudinal administrative data from 32,313 trans Australians who initiated testosterone-based GAHT (tGAHT) or estradiol-based GAHT (eGAHT) between 2013 and 2024. Employing a dynamic difference-in-differences design, we estimate the impacts on government expenditure and patient out-of-pocket costs in the 6 years after initiation, using future initiators as controls. We find that initiating tGAHT leads to an additional AUD$3119 (USD$2246) in government expenditure and AUD$143 (USD$103) in out-of-pocket costs over 6 years; corresponding estimates were AUD$8348 (USD$6011) and AUD$1269 (USD$914) for eGAHT recipients. For tGAHT recipients, both government and out-of-pocket costs declined after initiation, with mental healthcare reductions exceeding ongoing hormone therapy expenditure after 6 years. For eGAHT recipients, costs also fell but remained above baseline, driven by sustained prescription spending. Taken together with quality-of-life benefits, our results suggest GAHT is likely to be cost-effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.