Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42402186›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2026

Healthcare Costs Following Medical Gender-Affirmation: Evidence From Whole-of-Population Australian Administrative Data.

Karinna Saxby, Dennis Petrie, Brendan J Nolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Karinna SaxbyThe Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0100-8437
Dennis PetrieCentre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Caulfield, Australia.
Brendan J NolanTrans Health Research Group, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8836-165X

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council 2034450Sylvia and Charles Viertel Charitable FoundationUniversity of Melbourne McKenzie Fellowship 2025MCK182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gender incongruence in trans and nonbinary ("trans") populations is often associated with psychological distress and increased demand for mental healthcare. Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is a key component of care for many trans people, yet long-term evidence around its cost implications remains limited despite increasing uptake and policy attention worldwide. We provide the first population-based evidence on the healthcare costs of GAHT initiation using longitudinal administrative data from 32,313 trans Australians who initiated testosterone-based GAHT (tGAHT) or estradiol-based GAHT (eGAHT) between 2013 and 2024. Employing a dynamic difference-in-differences design, we estimate the impacts on government expenditure and patient out-of-pocket costs in the 6 years after initiation, using future initiators as controls. We find that initiating tGAHT leads to an additional AUD$3119 (USD$2246) in government expenditure and AUD$143 (USD$103) in out-of-pocket costs over 6 years; corresponding estimates were AUD$8348 (USD$6011) and AUD$1269 (USD$914) for eGAHT recipients. For tGAHT recipients, both government and out-of-pocket costs declined after initiation, with mental healthcare reductions exceeding ongoing hormone therapy expenditure after 6 years. For eGAHT recipients, costs also fell but remained above baseline, driven by sustained prescription spending. Taken together with quality-of-life benefits, our results suggest GAHT is likely to be cost-effective.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHormone Replacement TherapyTransgender PersonsAdultAustraliaEstradiolFemaleGender-Nonconforming PersonsHumansMaleMiddle AgedTestosteroneEstradiolTestosteroneAustraliagender‐affirming carehealthcare costsnonbinaryout‐of‐pocket coststransgender

Identifiers

PMID42402186
PMCPMC13532616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.