ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
A Physiologic Left Ventricle Flow Phantom for 4D Flow MRI Applications and CFD Verification.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn vivo verification for the development of cardiac MRI and CFD simulations is limited by scan time and motion artifacts. We developed a subject-specific, MRI-compatible left ventricle (LV) phantom within a closed-loop circulation system driven by an MRI-safe pump to reproduce cardiac motion and provide robust data for high-fidelity model validation.
methodsThe LV was fabricated from a PVA-based hydrogel to ensure MRI contrast, mechanical stability, and reusability. The complete setup fulfills key requirements for long-term leakage-free operation, close coil placement, and resembles in vivo soft-tissue contrasts. The setup reproduces healthy end-diastolic and end-systolic geometries, including physiologic contraction and papillary muscles. Integrated aortic and mitral valves approximate physiological opening and closing. High image contrast enabled time-resolved segmentation of the LV geometry.
resultsThe LV shape matched the target anatomy well, despite minor deviations at the basal transition and in valve orifice, with mild aortic stenosis and mitral regurgitation. 4D flow MRI confirmed physiological flow patterns, including diastolic vortex ring formation and realistic systolic outflow. Velocity estimates confirmed the phantom's applicability in an in vitro setting without scan time limitations. The acquired time-resolved MRI data enabled CFD simulations incorporating LV and valve motion, although segmentation accuracy remains a primary source of uncertainty.
conclusionThis LV phantom provides a stable, MRI-compatible platform for generating reproducible data to validate modeling of intracardiac hemodynamics. Its realistic anatomy, motion, and flow patterns support both simulation validation and MRI sequence development. Future work will focus on improving valve kinematics and LV motion fidelity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42402087What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.