Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42402047›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine2026

Epidemiological analysis of acute poisoning cases based on Poison control center data from 2021 to 2024.

Qing Tang, Jiaqi Xu, Xin Luo, Hao Wang, Shuxin Hua, Yanfen Chai, Lijun Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qing TangEmergency Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4973-7567
Jiaqi XuEmergency Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Xin LuoEmergency Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Hao WangEmergency Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Shuxin HuaEmergency Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Yanfen ChaiEmergency Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.
Lijun WangEmergency Medicine Department, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo determine the circumstances of acute poisoning cases at the Poison Control Center (2021-2024) and analyze their risk factors.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the demographic characteristics, clinical features, and prognosis of patients with acute poisoning at the Poison Control Center.

resultsThis study included 10,402 cases comprising drug poisoning (5,074), alcohol poisoning (2,316), carbon monoxide poisoning (1,803), pesticide poisoning (882), and chemical poisoning (327). The age group with the highest incidence of poisoning was 21-40 years old (37.94%,

conclusionDifferent types of poisoning have distinct sociodemographic characteristics, that should be considered when developing prevention and treatment policies. Personalized treatment plans should be tailored to different poisonings.

Indexed as

Poison Control CentersPoisoningAdolescentAdultAgedCarbon Monoxide PoisoningChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMaleMiddle AgedPesticidesRetrospective StudiesPesticidesAcute poisoningemergency treatmentepidemiologypoisoning center

Identifiers

PMID42402047
PMCPMC13348111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.