Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42401934›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in zoology2026

Lessons learned from surveying Galápagos marine iguanas using drones.

Andrea Varela-Jaramillo, Christian Winkelmann, Gustavo Pazmiño, Jenifer Suárez-Moncada, Estefanía Altamirano, Eduardo Espinoza, Marjorie Riofrío-Lazo, Diego Páez-Rosas, Gonzalo Rivas-Torres, Juan M Guayasamin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in zoology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Andrea Varela-JaramilloInstitute of Biology, Molecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany. andrea.varela@uni-leipzig.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0092-9915
Christian WinkelmannEberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Brandenburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8896-328X
Gustavo Pazmiño3Diversity, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8788-7542
Jenifer Suárez-MoncadaParque Nacional Galápagos PNG, Dirección de Ecosistemas, Isla Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6074-0843
Estefanía AltamiranoParque Nacional Galápagos PNG, Dirección de Ecosistemas, Isla Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3751-2890
Eduardo EspinozaParque Nacional Galápagos PNG, Dirección de Ecosistemas, Isla Santa Cruz, Galápagos, Ecuador.
Marjorie Riofrío-LazoColegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-3458
Diego Páez-RosasColegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2446-9888
Gonzalo Rivas-TorresColegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2704-8288
Juan M GuayasaminColegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ, Quito, Pichincha, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0098-978X
Sebastian SteinfartzInstitute of Biology, Molecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5347-3969
Amy MacLeodInstitute of Biology, Molecular Evolution and Systematics of Animals, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6726-9376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMonitoring wildlife in remote areas is a key challenge in conservation, with traditional methods proving increasingly inadequate in the face of accelerating biodiversity loss. Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) or drones help bridge data gaps, but methods require careful development and validation to ensure protocols are appropriate, accessible, reproducible, and generate reliable data. Herein, we develop detailed UAV-based protocols for surveying the endangered marine iguana (Amblyrhynchus cristatus), a lizard that is endemic to the coastlines of the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador. We outline steps from image collection and processing, through locating and counting animals, before validating results against traditional methods.

resultsWe find that UAV-based surveys outperform traditional ground-based surveys in terms of count reliability and effort in the field in different types of terrain and various population densities. Moreover, we show that consumer-level drones can be used effectively - even by newly trained pilots - and describe a standardised manual flying protocol that mimics automated flying whilst maintaining flexibility in the field. Finally, we recommend the use of orthomosaics (geometrically corrected, high-resolution aerial image maps) for surveys on flat terrains and 3D models (digital representations of the surface in three dimensions) for cliffs and compare several common image-processing platforms in terms of success to reconstruct marine iguanas.

conclusionOur protocols advance the effective monitoring of Galápagos marine iguanas. Whilst they were specifically developed for this species, we postulate that these could be applicable for other species across the archipelago, or in coastal and open landscapes worldwide.

Indexed as

Aerial surveysMonitoringPhotogrammetryProtocolsTechnologyUAVs

Identifiers

PMID42401934
PMCPMC13621696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.