Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42401909›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

Implementation of the PARTNERS model of care within two UK community mental health transformation systems: a qualitative realist evaluation.

Jo Day, Julia Frost, Alex Stirzaker, Debra Richards, John Gibson, Vanessa Pinfold, Richard Byng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jo DayNIHR Applied Research Collaboration South West, Department of Health and Community Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5164-3036
Julia FrostDepartment of Health and Social Care, Faculty of Health and Life Science, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, University of Exeter, St Luke's Campus, Heavitree Road, Exeter, EX1 2LU, UK. J.frost@exeter.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3503-5911
Alex StirzakerCommunity and Primary Care Research Group, University of Plymouth, ITTC Building, 1 Davy Road, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2580-9688
Debra RichardsCommunity and Primary Care Research Group, University of Plymouth, ITTC Building, 1 Davy Road, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2368-6522
John GibsonThe McPin Foundation, Unit 1.4, The Green House, 244-254 Cambridge Heath Rd, London, E2 9DA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1731-4869
Vanessa PinfoldThe McPin Foundation, Unit 1.4, The Green House, 244-254 Cambridge Heath Rd, London, E2 9DA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-8805
Richard ByngCommunity and Primary Care Research Group, University of Plymouth, ITTC Building, 1 Davy Road, Plymouth Science Park, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 8BX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7411-9467

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research RPR 270101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPARTNERS is a model of care that was co-designed with service users and carers to address the needs of people with severe mental illness to receive better support in primary care. Taking learning from a randomised controlled trial and process evaluation of this complex person-centred goal and coaching-based approach to care, our aim was to understand better the challenges of implementing PARTNERS in complex dynamic service delivery systems.

methodsWe identified two Integrated Care Systems that were interested in adopting the PARTNERS model of care. We trained practitioners to adopt PARTNERS to their local settings and provided meta-supervision (supervision of supervisors). We examined the implementation period that covered site engagement, training of staff and initial delivery of the new PARTNERS model of care, undertaking a qualitative realist evaluation informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Data collection involved semi-structured interviews with 10 System Change Leads, Supervisors, and trained intervention practitioners or 'Care Partners'; augmented by observations of supervision and practice within the systems and collation of documents. Analysis was qualitative informed by a realist approach and the CFIR.

resultsAnalysis identified complex overlapping configurations of teams and roles within them, leadership, and individual characteristics influenced the systems' ability to implement the PARTNERS model of care. The presence or absence of leadership was instrumental in providing clarity regarding where the delivery of PARTNERS sat within newly emerging systems and was an important indicator of successful implementation. Collaborative leadership and supervision, alongside training tailored to the needs of individual practitioners, increased or decreased perceived self-efficacy amongst individual practitioners and their confidence in delivering the PARTNERS model of care.

conclusionsWe identified that both internal and external supervision and system leadership are crucial to the implementation of PARTNERS, backed up by training delivered by a clinician and people with lived experience, to ensure that this new model of care is embedded in everyday practice. It is likely that the absence of any one of these mechanisms could make implementation and sustainability of the PARTNERS model challenging. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedMental DisordersHumansInterviews as TopicLeadershipModels, OrganizationalQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomCommunity mental health servicesConsolidated Framework for Implementation ResearchImplementationLeadershipMental health transformationQualitative realist evaluationSevere mental illnessSupervision

Identifiers

PMID42401909
PMCPMC13340360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.