ArticleBMC health services research2026
Implementation of the PARTNERS model of care within two UK community mental health transformation systems: a qualitative realist evaluation.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPARTNERS is a model of care that was co-designed with service users and carers to address the needs of people with severe mental illness to receive better support in primary care. Taking learning from a randomised controlled trial and process evaluation of this complex person-centred goal and coaching-based approach to care, our aim was to understand better the challenges of implementing PARTNERS in complex dynamic service delivery systems.
methodsWe identified two Integrated Care Systems that were interested in adopting the PARTNERS model of care. We trained practitioners to adopt PARTNERS to their local settings and provided meta-supervision (supervision of supervisors). We examined the implementation period that covered site engagement, training of staff and initial delivery of the new PARTNERS model of care, undertaking a qualitative realist evaluation informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Data collection involved semi-structured interviews with 10 System Change Leads, Supervisors, and trained intervention practitioners or 'Care Partners'; augmented by observations of supervision and practice within the systems and collation of documents. Analysis was qualitative informed by a realist approach and the CFIR.
resultsAnalysis identified complex overlapping configurations of teams and roles within them, leadership, and individual characteristics influenced the systems' ability to implement the PARTNERS model of care. The presence or absence of leadership was instrumental in providing clarity regarding where the delivery of PARTNERS sat within newly emerging systems and was an important indicator of successful implementation. Collaborative leadership and supervision, alongside training tailored to the needs of individual practitioners, increased or decreased perceived self-efficacy amongst individual practitioners and their confidence in delivering the PARTNERS model of care.
conclusionsWe identified that both internal and external supervision and system leadership are crucial to the implementation of PARTNERS, backed up by training delivered by a clinician and people with lived experience, to ensure that this new model of care is embedded in everyday practice. It is likely that the absence of any one of these mechanisms could make implementation and sustainability of the PARTNERS model challenging. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.