Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42401897›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

EMBRACE COMPASS: protocol for a multi-country cross-sectional comparative analysis of pregnancy and postnatal care architecture.

Anastasija Arechvo, Andrada Crisan, Yanzhong Wang, Eran Bornstein, Ismail Bhorat, Fabricio Da Silva Costa, Kypros H Nicolaides, Josip Car, EMBRACE COMPASS Collaborator Group

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anastasija ArechvoKing's Population Health Institute, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK. a.arechvo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0151-1932
Andrada CrisanFetal Medicine Research Institute, King's College Hospital, London, SE5 8BB, UK.
Yanzhong WangKing's Population Health Institute, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Eran BornsteinDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital-Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, 11549, USA.
Ismail BhoratFetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Fabricio Da Silva CostaMaternal Fetal Medicine Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital and School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, 4214, Australia.
Kypros H NicolaidesKing's Population Health Institute, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
Josip CarKing's Population Health Institute, King's College London, London, WC2R 2LS, UK.
EMBRACE COMPASS Collaborator Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal morbidity and mortality remain major global health challenges, with substantial variation in maternity care delivery across health systems. Although clinical guidelines are widely available, there is limited systematic, multi-country mapping of maternity care systems as integrated architectures. Evidence linking system design and implementation to population outcomes is also limited. This study aims to compare maternity care systems across countries for gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, perinatal depression, and uncomplicated pregnancy using a structured, multi-layered care architecture framework.

methodsThis is a multi-country, cross-sectional, mixed-methods comparative study including twenty countries across all World Health Organization regions and income groups, selected using purposive sampling. Data will be collected using a standardised instrument with more than 140 items mapped to a nine-layer care architecture framework, covering policy, clinical standards, guidelines, models of care, care pathways, clinical protocols, digital systems, patient experience, and financing. Data sources will include structured country submissions, systematic document review, and validation interviews with clinicians and policymakers. Each domain will be independently scored by two reviewers using a four-point ordinal scale, with assessment of inter-rater reliability. Country profiles will be validated through member checking and triangulation of documentary and interview data. Comparative analyses will include descriptive profiling, cross-country comparisons, clustering to identify system typologies, and gap analysis against international benchmarks. Implementation and equity dimensions will be assessed using established frameworks, and physical activity guidance will be examined as a cross-cutting domain. Exploratory ecological analyses will assess associations between system characteristics and publicly available outcomes, including maternal mortality, preterm birth, stillbirth, and caesarean section rates, using regression models. A structured consensus process will be used to develop minimum care architecture standards and harmonisation recommendations. DISCUSSION: This study will provide a structured and reproducible approach to characterising and comparing maternity care systems globally. By identifying variation in system design, implementation, and equity considerations, the findings will inform policy, support harmonisation of care, and guide improvements in maternal and perinatal outcomes across diverse settings. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesPostnatal CareCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGlobal HealthHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPregnancyResearch DesignDepressionGestational DiabetesGuidelinesHypertensive disorders of pregnancyPolicyPregnancyPrenatal care

Identifiers

PMID42401897
PMCPMC13613625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.