ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
EMBRACE COMPASS: protocol for a multi-country cross-sectional comparative analysis of pregnancy and postnatal care architecture.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMaternal morbidity and mortality remain major global health challenges, with substantial variation in maternity care delivery across health systems. Although clinical guidelines are widely available, there is limited systematic, multi-country mapping of maternity care systems as integrated architectures. Evidence linking system design and implementation to population outcomes is also limited. This study aims to compare maternity care systems across countries for gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, perinatal depression, and uncomplicated pregnancy using a structured, multi-layered care architecture framework.
methodsThis is a multi-country, cross-sectional, mixed-methods comparative study including twenty countries across all World Health Organization regions and income groups, selected using purposive sampling. Data will be collected using a standardised instrument with more than 140 items mapped to a nine-layer care architecture framework, covering policy, clinical standards, guidelines, models of care, care pathways, clinical protocols, digital systems, patient experience, and financing. Data sources will include structured country submissions, systematic document review, and validation interviews with clinicians and policymakers. Each domain will be independently scored by two reviewers using a four-point ordinal scale, with assessment of inter-rater reliability. Country profiles will be validated through member checking and triangulation of documentary and interview data. Comparative analyses will include descriptive profiling, cross-country comparisons, clustering to identify system typologies, and gap analysis against international benchmarks. Implementation and equity dimensions will be assessed using established frameworks, and physical activity guidance will be examined as a cross-cutting domain. Exploratory ecological analyses will assess associations between system characteristics and publicly available outcomes, including maternal mortality, preterm birth, stillbirth, and caesarean section rates, using regression models. A structured consensus process will be used to develop minimum care architecture standards and harmonisation recommendations. DISCUSSION: This study will provide a structured and reproducible approach to characterising and comparing maternity care systems globally. By identifying variation in system design, implementation, and equity considerations, the findings will inform policy, support harmonisation of care, and guide improvements in maternal and perinatal outcomes across diverse settings. REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.