ArticleBMC medical education2026
Knowledge, attitudes, practices and clinical preparedness regarding porcelain laminate veneers among dental interns.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent years, increasing aesthetic expectations have led to a growing demand for porcelain laminate veneer treatments. This study aims to address a gap in the literature by evaluating the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of undergraduate dental students regarding porcelain laminate veneers, within the context of updated dental curricula, thereby providing insight into their current level of theoretical understanding and clinical preparedness.
methodsThis study employed a descriptive cross-sectional design. The sample consisted of final-year students from the Faculty of Dentistry at Atatürk University. A total of 150 students were invited to participate; those who agreed and completed the questionnaire in full were administered a KAP-based survey adapted for porcelain laminate veneer applications.
resultsA total of 134 dental interns participated in the study, of whom 61.9% were female and 38.1% were male. Based on objective assessments, the level of theoretical knowledge was found to be high, with correct response rates ranging between 85% and 94% for many items; however, lower success rates were observed in technically demanding aspects, such as cement thickness effects on shade selection (28.4%) and preparation classifications (45.5%). Subjective evaluations revealed limited clinical experience and self-confidence; notably, only 32.1% of participants had encountered a laminate veneer case in clinical practice. While no significant difference was found in theoretical knowledge levels by gender (p = 0.083), male participants demonstrated significantly higher self-perceived clinical confidence scores compared to females (p = 0.024). A weak negative correlation was observed between objective knowledge scores and self-perceived clinical confidence scores (r = -0.201, p = 0.020).
conclusionsDespite a high level of theoretical knowledge among dental interns, this theoretical knowledge was not reflected in students' self-perceived clinical preparedness and confidence. Furthermore, a weak negative correlation was identified between objective knowledge and self-perceived clinical confidence scores, suggesting these constructs are related but distinct. These findings highlight the need to strengthen simulation-based training, clinical case exposure, and complication management within undergraduate prosthodontic education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.