ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Does clinical documentation reflect how parents and clinicians share decisions about surgery?
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWhile use of shared decision-making (SDM) is widely accepted and applied in practice, it is unknown how core elements of SDM are reflected in clinical documentation. This knowledge gap is particularly relevant in the setting of surgery in children, where parents serve as proxy decision-makers.
methodsWe analyzed transcribed audio-recorded outpatient encounters and corresponding medical documentation for pediatric patients undergoing evaluation for elective surgery. Visit transcripts and medical record documentation of the corresponding clinical encounter were coded for two core elements of shared decision-making: parental concerns and preferences. We assessed the frequency (visit-level and instance-level) and content of these elements expressed in verbal communication and in clinical documentation.
resultsOf 109 visits, concerns and preferences were discussed in nearly half of encounters (Visit level: Concerns n = 46, 42%; Preferences n = 49, 45%). Most verbally-expressed concerns (e.g., "we're worried about her breathing"; "…she sleeps with me. I'm constantly shaking her. She scares me a lot") focused on symptoms and surgical risk whereas preferences (e.g., "I would just rather take them out"; "I'd definitely rather go the conservative route") centered on treatment decisions. Of the total unique instances of stated concerns (n = 74) and preferences (n = 62), about half were recorded in the medical record (Instance-level: Concerns n = 34, 46%; Preferences n = 28, 49%).
conclusionsThese findings show that parent preferences and concerns that are discussed during pediatric surgical encounters are not routinely reflected in clinical documentation. Thoughtful documentation of family perspectives may enhance transparency, support communication across the health continuum, and contribute to high quality patient- and family-centered care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.