Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42401867›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Health literacy and attitudes toward prenatal screening tests among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study in Turkey.

Dilek Hacıvelioğlu, Nurcan Çelik Odabaşı, Pınar Solmaz Hasdemir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dilek HacıvelioğluFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery, İstanbul Medipol University, Göztepe Neighborhood, Kavacık, Atatürk St. No: 40, İstanbul, Beykoz, 34810, Türkiye. dyakti@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4806-6888
Nurcan Çelik OdabaşıFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-6430
Pınar Solmaz HasdemirFaculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0754-4655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the widespread use of screening methods and the increase in advanced age pregnancies, interest in prenatal screening tests is increasing day by day. In Türkiye, the Ministry of Health recommends that pregnant women be informed about prenatal screening tests and ultrasonographic examinations for fetal anomalies and chromosomal aneuploidy. Although these tests are not mandatory, it is important for pregnant women to understand their purpose and scope before making a decision. This requires having sufficient health literacy (HL). This study aimed to examine the HL levels of pregnant women and their perspectives on prenatal screening tests.

methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted with 477 pregnant women in the pregnancy follow-up clinic of a university hospital in Turkey. Data were obtained through the Descriptive Information Form-comprising items on sociodemographic characteristics, pregnancy, and prenatal screening-and the Health Literacy Scale (adaptation from HLS-EU-47).

resultsThe average age of pregnant women was 27.55 ± 5.56. Pregnant women were most familiar with the double screening test (25.3%). Pregnant women most frequently received information or counseling on prenatal screening tests from obstetricians (44.2%) and the internet/social media (26.3%). The mean HL score was 116.11 ± 11.47, with higher levels observed among those without consanguinity with their spouses and without a family history of hereditary diseases. HL also differed significantly by regular antenatal follow-up, screening practices, and certain sociodemographic factors (p < 0.05). Higher HL was associated with greater uptake of screening. Pregnant women who underwent screening tests and those who wanted to undergo screening tests had higher HL levels.

conclusionsFindings suggest that strategies to improve pregnant women's HL should focus on those with low socioeconomic status and advanced age. Integrating HL assessment into routine primary care monitoring and providing visually supported, simplified education on prenatal screening may be beneficial. Midwives should strengthen communication skills suited to pregnant women's HL levels. Further research is recommended on the links between HL, screening tests, and related counseling and interventions among different groups.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth LiteracyPregnant PeoplePrenatal DiagnosisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyTurkeyYoung AdultHealth literacyMidwifePregnantPrenatal screeningTurkey

Identifiers

PMID42401867
PMCPMC13613852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.