Observational studyBMC surgery2026
Perioperative factors associated with intraoperative circulatory decompensation during lung transplantation under initial VV-ECMO support: an exploratory single-center study.
Observational study in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative circulatory decompensation during lung transplantation is a life-threatening event that often necessitates a challenging transition from veno-venous (VV) to veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). This study evaluated perioperative variables associated with decompensation under an explicitly exploratory observational framework.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 97 patients with end-stage lung disease undergoing lung transplantation with initial VV-ECMO support from January 2020 to December 2022. Intraoperative circulatory decompensation was redefined using objective hemodynamic and echocardiographic criteria; VV-to-VA conversion was recorded as a management consequence rather than as a defining criterion. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance confounding factors, resulting in 75 analyzed patients. Candidate models were revised as exploratory penalized models and internally assessed by repeated fivefold cross-validation and bootstrap optimism correction.
resultsIn the matched descriptive comparison, pH and lactate remained robustly different after FDR correction, while highest intraoperative PASP, pulmonary valve VMAX, aortic valve VMAX, and heart rate were interpreted as exploratory signals. To reduce temporal bias, we separated a preoperative/peri-induction model from a secondary intraoperative monitoring model. In internal validation, the preoperative/peri-induction model achieved a repeated fivefold cross-validation AUC of 0.803 and a bootstrap optimism-corrected AUC of 0.813, with a Brier score of 0.151. The intraoperative monitoring model, which included highest intraoperative PASP, achieved a repeated fivefold cross-validation AUC of 0.853 and a bootstrap optimism-corrected AUC of 0.865, with a Brier score of 0.121.
conclusionsLower preoperative arterial pH, higher lactate, and dynamic intraoperative pulmonary pressure changes were associated with clinically documented circulatory decompensation in this exploratory single-center cohort. These internally assessed findings require external validation before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.