ArticleBMC oral health2026
Evaluation of orthodontic treatment need awareness in individuals with different malocclusions.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to evaluate the associations among malocclusion awareness, aesthetic perception, and motivations for seeking orthodontic care in relation to demographic variables.
methodsA total of 180 individuals aged 13-35 years with no prior history of orthodontic treatment were included in this cross-sectional study. Awareness of orthodontic treatment need was assessed using the Aesthetic Component of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN-AC) and a 5-point Likert scale. Reasons for seeking care, referral patterns, and sources of orthodontic information were recorded. Data were analyzed using non-parametric tests and Spearman's correlation analysis (p < 0.05).
resultsA strong negative correlation was identified between IOTN-AC scores and smile satisfaction (r = -0.661; p < 0.05). Significant differences were observed among malocclusion classes, with the highest scores recorded in individuals with Class III malocclusion (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found with respect to sex or age groups (p > 0.05). The majority of participants reported dissatisfaction with their smile. Significant associations were also observed between reasons for seeking care and both malocclusion type and age.
conclusionAesthetic perception is a key determinant of orthodontic treatment demand and is closely associated with malocclusion type. Therefore, patients' aesthetic concerns and awareness should be considered during orthodontic evaluation and treatment planning to optimize patient-centered outcomes. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.