Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Oral anticoagulant prescribing and DOAC dosing appropriateness in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study from Vietnam.
Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended over vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). However, real-world prescribing patterns and dosing appropriateness in low- and middle-income countries remain poorly characterized. This study evaluated patterns of oral anticoagulant use and identified clinical determinants of suboptimal prescribing in a tertiary cardiovascular center in Vietnam.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study of 209 patients with NVAF who received oral anticoagulation at a tertiary cardiovascular center between 2023 and 2024. Data were extracted from electronic medical records, including demographics, comorbidities, renal function, bleeding history, and prescribed anticoagulants. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with anticoagulant selection, defined as DOAC versus VKA use. DOAC dosing appropriateness was assessed according to the 2021 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide, and predictors of potentially inappropriate dose reduction were evaluated.
resultsDOACs were prescribed in 77.0% of patients, most commonly rivaroxaban, which accounted for 55.3% of all anticoagulant prescriptions. VKAs were prescribed in 23.0% of patients. Among VKA users, 85.4% had INR values outside the therapeutic range at admission, largely due to subtherapeutic international normalized ratio values. Reduced DOAC doses were prescribed in 88 of 161 DOAC users (54.7%). Among 85 assessable reduced-dose DOAC users, 42 (49.4%) were classified as having potentially inappropriate dose reduction. In the parsimonious multivariable model, age ≥ 75 years was associated with higher odds of DOAC use (odds ratio [OR] 5.08; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95-13.23; p = 0.001), whereas female sex (OR 0.43; 95% CI 0.21-0.91; p = 0.027), heart failure (OR 0.23; 95% CI 0.09-0.59; p = 0.002), and prior bleeding (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.05-0.87; p = 0.031) were associated with lower odds of DOAC use.
conclusionIn this single-center retrospective study from Vietnam, oral anticoagulant prescribing in patients with NVAF showed several areas for optimization, including frequent INR values outside the therapeutic range at admission among VKA users and frequent potentially inappropriate DOAC dose reduction. These findings support the need for improved dose optimization, and monitoring strategies, but should be interpreted cautiously give the observational design and inpatients data source.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.