Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42401782›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

The properties of personal semantics.

Annick F N Tanguay, Kim Thériault, Sharice Clough, Vanessa Taler, Louis Renoult, Patrick S R Davidson

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Annick F N TanguaySchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. annick.fn.tanguay@gmail.com.
Kim ThériaultSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sharice CloughMultimodal Language Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Vanessa TalerSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Louis RenoultSchool of Psychology, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Patrick S R DavidsonSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent cognitive neuroscience research has uncovered some similarities and some differences between general semantic memory (GS; e.g., knowledge about family in general) and personal semantic memory (PS; e.g., knowledge about my family in particular). To better understand the representational content and cognitive processes of PS and their relation to general semantics, we adapted a staple of General semantic memory research, the Property Generation task. In a first study, we randomly assigned 240 adult participants to a traditional General semantics perspective (e.g., listing the properties of families and bedrooms in general) or to a PS perspective (e.g., my family, my bedroom) in a between-subjects design. In a second, replication study, 124 participants completed the task in a within-subject design, taking each perspective for different concepts. Relative to the General semantics condition, the PS condition was associated with more features; these were more semantically distant from each other, and included adjectives more frequently and nouns less frequently. However, the two conditions had substantial (~46%) overlap in the frequency of their features. The findings contribute to the identification of the cognitive differences (e.g., semantic richness) and similarities (e.g., correspondence in semantic features) between personal and general semantic memory.

Indexed as

Episodic memoryFeaturesPersonal semanticsSemantic distanceSemantic memory

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.