Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42401779›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026

Peptidomics in the Spotlight: Advanced Sample Treatment Techniques and Analytical Insights.

Alessio Lenzi, Mariano De Cristofaro, Denise Biagini, Silvia Ghimenti, Fabio Di Francesco, Tommaso Lomonaco

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alessio LenziDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. alessio.lenzi@unipi.it.
Mariano De CristofaroDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Denise BiaginiDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Silvia GhimentiDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Fabio Di FrancescoDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Tommaso LomonacoDepartment of Chemistry and Industrial Chemistry, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the analysis of intact peptides (peptidomics) has remained a relatively under-explored field, where its potential as a bridge between proteomics and metabolomics has only recently been recognized. Currently, immunoassay techniques are the primary method for quantifying endogenous peptides in biological samples, mainly due to their high-throughput and minimal sample manipulation. However, antibody-based strategies face important limitations, particularly in terms of specificity.Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry has emerged as a powerful and reliable alternative for the analysis of native peptides in biological fluids. While conventional sample preparation approaches, such as protein precipitation, enable rapid and broad peptide extraction, they are often inadequate for quantifying low-abundance peptides, leading to matrix effects and ion suppression.This chapter explores the critical aspects of antibody-free sample preparation in peptidomics, emphasizing advanced and innovative approaches. We also discuss methods for peptide isolation and purification, spanning from traditional approaches such as protein precipitation and solid-phase extraction to more recent microextraction techniques. Special attention is given to microextraction by packed sorbent, ultrafiltration, and electromembrane extraction, which offer significant advantages in efficiency, sensitivity, and scalability. By minimizing both solvent and sample requirements, these approaches provide new opportunities for improving analytical performance in peptidomics.

Indexed as

PeptidesProteomicsAnimalsHumansLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometrySolid Phase ExtractionTandem Mass SpectrometryPeptidesClinical peptidomicsIntact peptidesLC-MS/MSMicroextraction techniquesSample treatment

Identifiers

PMID42401779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.