ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2026
Peptidomics in the Spotlight: Advanced Sample Treatment Techniques and Analytical Insights.
Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, the analysis of intact peptides (peptidomics) has remained a relatively under-explored field, where its potential as a bridge between proteomics and metabolomics has only recently been recognized. Currently, immunoassay techniques are the primary method for quantifying endogenous peptides in biological samples, mainly due to their high-throughput and minimal sample manipulation. However, antibody-based strategies face important limitations, particularly in terms of specificity.Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry has emerged as a powerful and reliable alternative for the analysis of native peptides in biological fluids. While conventional sample preparation approaches, such as protein precipitation, enable rapid and broad peptide extraction, they are often inadequate for quantifying low-abundance peptides, leading to matrix effects and ion suppression.This chapter explores the critical aspects of antibody-free sample preparation in peptidomics, emphasizing advanced and innovative approaches. We also discuss methods for peptide isolation and purification, spanning from traditional approaches such as protein precipitation and solid-phase extraction to more recent microextraction techniques. Special attention is given to microextraction by packed sorbent, ultrafiltration, and electromembrane extraction, which offer significant advantages in efficiency, sensitivity, and scalability. By minimizing both solvent and sample requirements, these approaches provide new opportunities for improving analytical performance in peptidomics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42401779What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.