ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Spectral CT-based habitat analysis for predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo investigate the predictive value of habitat imaging based on spectral CT-derived iodine maps (IMs) for pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in gastric cancer (GC). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective, two-center study included 151 patients with pathologically confirmed GC who underwent NAT followed by gastrectomy between July 2022 and June 2025. All patients underwent dual-phase, contrast-enhanced, dual-layer spectral CT scans before NAT. Based on tumor regression grade, patients were categorized as responders or non-responders. In venous-phase IMs, tumor voxels in the entire lesion were clustered into distinct habitats using the k-means algorithm. The volume fraction of each habitat and an intratumoral heterogeneity score (ITHscore) were calculated. Univariate analysis and logistic regression analyses determined predictive parameters among clinicopathologic and IM-based variables. A weighted logistic regression model for responders was developed and validated using fivefold cross-validation and an external test set.
resultsAmong the 151 patients, 54 (35.8%) were responders. Three distinct perfusion habitats (high, middle, and low) were identified. Responders exhibited a higher volume fraction of the low-perfusion habitat and a lower ITHscore (both p < 0.05). By integrating these two metrics, patients were stratified into four perfusion subtypes, with response rates ranging from 75.0% to 17.4% (p < 0.001). The predictive model combining perfusion subtype and Lauren classification achieved an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.794 (0.751-0.836) in internal cross-validation and 0.782 (0.605-0.909) in the external test set.
conclusionIM-derived habitat imaging can distinguish distinct perfusion subtypes, suggesting a promising approach for predicting pathologic response to NAT in GC. KEY POINTS: Question Accurately predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy prior to treatment in gastric cancer remains challenging due to the lack of reliable biomarkers. Findings Perfusion subtypes identified through iodine map-based habitat imaging effectively predict tumor regression in gastric cancer following neoadjuvant therapy. Clinical relevance Iodine map-based habitat imaging is a promising biomarker for noninvasively predicting pathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with gastric cancer, thereby enabling more personalized treatment strategies for this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42401766What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.