Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42401751›Full record

ArticleNPJ cardiovascular health2026

Improving arrhythmic risk prediction using cardiac magnetic resonance within deep learning in ischemic heart disease.

Ahmet Sen, Richard E Jones, Holly Morgan, Hassan Zaidi, Brian P Halliday, Daniel J Hammersley, Amedeo Chiribiri, Divaka Perera, Sanjay K Prasad, Martin J Bishop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ cardiovascular health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ahmet SenKing's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, UK. ahmet.1.sen@kcl.ac.uk.
Richard E JonesImperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Holly MorganKing's College London, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence at the School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine & Sciences, London, UK.
Hassan ZaidiKing's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, UK.
Brian P HallidayImperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Daniel J HammersleyKing's College London, British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence at the School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine & Sciences, London, UK.
Amedeo ChiribiriKing's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, UK.
Divaka PereraCardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sanjay K PrasadImperial College London, National Heart and Lung Institute, London, UK.
Martin J BishopKing's College London, School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, London, UK.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/22/11159rosetrees trust FS/ICRF/24/26128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden arrhythmic death remains a major clinical risk in ischemic heart disease (IHD), underscoring the need for improved risk stratification. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) provides measures of scar burden and heterogeneity, but its incremental prognostic value beyond conventional markers such as left ventricular ejection fraction remains uncertain. We analysed two independent IHD cohorts (Dataset 1: n = 399, 54 events; National Research Ethics Service approvals 07/H0708/83 and 09/H0504/104+5; Dataset 2: n = 424, 50 events; derived from the prospectively registered REVIVED-BCIS2 trial, ISRCTN45979711, registered 20 November 2012)using clinical and LGE-CMR-derived variables to evaluate the contribution of LGE-CMR features, and compare machine learning-based survival modelling approaches. A brute-force feature-selection strategy identified optimal predictor subsets for Cox proportional hazards models, Random Survival Forests, and DeepSurv, evaluated using cross-cohort and pooled validation strategies. Scar entropy consistently emerged as a strong predictor of major arrhythmic events. Non-linear approaches outperformed Cox regression, with DeepSurv demonstrating superior generalization across cohorts and Random Survival Forests showing robust performance in pooled analyses. These findings support scar heterogeneity as an important prognostic marker and suggest that machine-learning survival models may improve arrhythmic risk prediction in patients with IHD.

Identifiers

PMID42401751
PMCPMC13392232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.