ArticleScientific reports2026
Adsorption of cationic and anionic dyes using chemically modified activated carbon from agricultural waste.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methylene blue (MB), a cationic dye, and Congo red (CR), an anionic dye, were adsorbed from aqueous solution using activated carbons that were prepared from date pits (date pits AC) biomass. These adsorbents' surface chemistry was described using a variety of analytical methods, and the corresponding adsorption interactions were examined using the findings. The adsorption mechanism was discussed based on adsorption isotherm, kinetic, and surface characterization results. In order to assess the adsorption behaviour of the biomass, batch adsorption studies were carried out and a number of parameters, including pH, initial concentration of the adsorbates, adsorbent dose, time, and temperature, were optimized. Results showed that the maximal uptakes of MB were 833 mg g
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.