ArticleNature communications2026
Visual learning at fast and slow timescales is driven by distinct plasticity rules in primate inferotemporal cortex.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sharpened Visual Memory Representations Are Reflected in Inferotemporal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We learn to recognize a vast array of familiar objects, a process involving learning-related changes in inferotemporal cortex (IT) activity. A challenge to discovering mechanisms of familiarity learning is that it spans multiple timescales from minutes to days, and is accompanied by simultaneous changes in cellular, synaptic, and network properties. We leverage an integrated experimental-theoretical approach, using IT recordings in two male macaques during familiarity learning within and across sessions to infer underlying plasticity mechanisms. We identified two timescales of learning-related changes spanning minutes to days, consistent with distinct synaptic and cellular mechanisms. Across sessions, averaged responses gradually decreased with familiarity, consistent with synaptic plasticity. In contrast, within-session changes, including rapid response decay and increased spontaneous activity, aligned with intrinsic plasticity mechanisms. Recurrent networks endowed with learning rules inferred from experiments replicated the observed learning dynamics, supporting our hypothesis of distinct learning mechanisms - slow, synaptic plasticity at long timescales and fast, intrinsic plasticity at short timescales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.