Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42401567›Full record

ReviewBlood cancer journal2026

Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: incorporation of recent advances into current treatment strategies.

Elias Jabbour, Hagop Kantarjian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood cancer journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elias JabbourFrom the Department of Leukemia, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. ejabbour@mdanderson.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-6119
Hagop KantarjianFrom the Department of Leukemia, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-3307

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcomes in B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) have improved over time due to therapeutic advances, and improved disease monitoring and prognostication. The BCR::ABL1 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were the first targeted therapies to significantly impact the therapeutic trajectory and outcomes of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph-positive) ALL. Similarly, antibodies targeting CD19/20/22 and engineered chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapies have drastically changed the therapeutic landscape and outcomes of B-cell ALL. Incorporation of the bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) blinatumomab has demonstrated a significant survival advantage in patients with both newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-negative) and Ph-positive ALL. Inotuzumab ozogamicin, the anti-CD22 antibody drug conjugate (ADC), has also been safely integrated into the frontline treatment backbones in both younger and older patients. CAR T-cell therapy has resulted in durable remissions in relapsed/refractory (R/R) ALL, especially with lower disease burden. CAR T-cell therapy consolidation in the frontline setting is being pursued with the goal of reducing the need for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT). Future research is focusing on treatment optimization through replacement of chemotherapy with immunotherapies with the goal of reducing toxicities, minimizing the need for alloSCT, and shortening the intensity and duration of therapy while improving long-term outcomes.

Indexed as

Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdultAntibodies, BispecificHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveAntibodies, Bispecific

Identifiers

PMID42401567
PMCPMC13612391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.