Observational studyFamily practice2026
Deferred prescribing in practice: an observational study in community pharmacies in France during 2024-5 and feedback from pharmacists.
Observational study in Family practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExcessive use of antibiotics promotes antibiotic resistance. Deferred prescribing (prescriptions dispensed according to clinical progress) is a strategy to reduce this overconsumption. Recognized in some countries, this practice is poorly documented and not recommended in France.
objectivesTo determine the rate of deferred outpatient prescriptions, their dispensing rate, and their characteristics.
methodsThis observational study was conducted over 1 year in 20 pharmacies and focused on prescriptions with a handwritten note indicating deferred dispensing. The data collected included patient age and sex, prescriber specialty, drug class, dispensing delay, and population density. Feedback from pharmacists was also collected.
resultsOf 174 deferred prescriptions (0.021% of prescriptions), 38% were dispensed immediately, 20% were dispensed later, and 42% were not dispensed. The majority were prescribed by general practitioners (84%). Dispensing was significantly more immediate in urban areas (P = 0.02). Feedback analysis showed that pharmacists had a positive perception of deferred prescribing, seeing it as a tool for empowerment, antibiotic reduction, and collaboration. However, its implementation was limited by logistical constraints and patients' perception of the prescription as a right to dispensing.
conclusionEffectiveness of deferred prescribing in reducing antibiotic consumption appears to be limited, especially in urban areas. Deferred prescription has little effect on antibiotic consumption. It seems more important to learn not to prescribe antibiotics when infections are viral. Delaying the prescription may help, but communication between pharmacists, doctors, and patients needs to be strengthened. Harmonization of practices and patient education need to be improved in this context of cascading uncertainties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.