Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400844›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

AI-Driven Protein Research: From Prediction to Design.

Guodong Min, Huan Peng

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guodong MinSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Huan PengCollege of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China. peng_huan@hust.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteins are central to nearly all biological processes, mediating enzymatic catalysis, structural scaffolding, and molecular signaling. Deciphering how linear amino acid sequences encode three-dimensional conformations and biological functions has long been a defining challenge in molecular life sciences. Traditional structural biology approaches, such as X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, have established the field, yet their high cost, labor intensity, and limited throughput restrict comprehensive coverage of the proteome. The exponential expansion of protein sequence databases, paired with advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and deep learning, has drastically accelerated our ability to predict, annotate, and even design proteins. In this mini review, we trace the evolution of AI-driven methods in protein research, from early residue-contact prediction using coevolutionary information to transformative breakthroughs, the rise of protein language models (PLMs), and the emerging era of generative design and functional modeling. Throughout, we highlight key conceptual advances and their translational implications for biomedical science and biotechnology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputational BiologyProteinsDatabases, ProteinHumansModels, MolecularPrediction AlgorithmsProtein ConformationProtein EngineeringProteinsArtificial intelligenceGenerative designMolecular dockingProtein language modelProtein structure prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.