ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2026
Update on Genetic Chorea.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewChorea is a symptom of numerous pathophysiologically and clinically heterogeneous genetic conditions. A number of developments have been made in this field over the last years linked to improved genomic testing, large cohort collaborations and improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms. This review aims to provide an update on the new genetic conditions and phenotypes linked to chorea disorders, their modification factors and pathophysiological background. RECENT
findingsSeveral novel genetic conditions have been linked to chorea over the last 3 years, including mutations in FTH1, NAA60, ACBD6 or TOR1AIP2. Also, novel phenotypes have been established and linked to chorea, such as Adult-onset Neurodegeneration in Nucleotide Excision Repair Disorder (NERD-ND). Major advances have been made in understanding of the pathophysiological role of somatic instability in HD. Striatal pallidal neurons (SPNs) with 150-500 + CAG repeats seem to lose positive and then negative features of neuronal identity, de-repress senescence/apoptosis genes, ultimately leading to cell death. Improved recognition of the genetic background of chorea leads to more effective diagnostic processes, better prognostication and improved personalized treatment. The findings on somatic instability in HD suggest that neurodegeneration in HD is an asynchronous DNA process for >95% of a neuron's life, with majority of neurons in all disease stages having a HTT gene which is not biologically harmful. This has potential major therapeutic implications not only in HD but also in other neurological repeat expansion disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.