ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
A novel SE-ResNet architecture for continuous estimation of wrist and hand movements from HD-sEMG.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid technological advancements in flexible manipulators, it has emerged as a research hot spot to realize a more flexible control strategy driven by human movements. This study investigates the feasibility of utilizing deep neural networks and a squeeze-and-excitation (SE) module based on high-density surface electromyography (HD-sEMG) signals, so as to enhance the prediction accuracy for the two-degrees-of-freedom wrist and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint angles. Two residual networks, namely, a 32-layer ResNet (ResNet-32) and a 56-layer ResNet (ResNet-56), were proposed, and their performance was compared with that of an 8-layer convolutional neural network (CNN-8). A dataset was collected from 7 subjects for the evaluation of prediction performance, which contains HD-sEMG and kinematic signals corresponding to wrist and hand movements. The root mean square error (RMSE) was taken as the evaluation metric. The RMSE of ResNet-32 and ResNet-56 for simultaneous movements can reach 17.80 and 17.99 degrees, respectively, which is significantly better than that of CNN-8. The findings revealed that an appropriate increase in the number of network layers is sufficient to improve prediction performance, because an excessive layer accumulation may incur an undesirable computational overhead and few improvements. Further, the ResNet-32 model was augmented with SE module, named as SE-ResNet model. A support vector machine (SVM) was introduced for comparative analysis. The RMSE of the SE-ResNet model for simultaneous movements can reach 16.48 degrees, which is better than that of SVM and ResNet-32. In brief, our SE-ResNet model exhibits better prediction performance and robustness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42400813What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.