ReviewJournal of prevention (2022)2026
Primary Prevention Interventions for Problematic Substance Use in Adolescents: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of prevention (2022), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary prevention interventions represent a promising strategy for addressing rising rates of substance use among adolescents, yet substantial heterogeneity exists in intervention formats, content, goals, outcomes measured, and effectiveness. This scoping review aimed to document primary prevention initiatives targeting adolescent substance use. A systematic search of APA PsycINFO, ERIC, Medline, CINAHL, and SocINDEX was conducted for articles published 2020 onward. Eligible studies examined primary prevention interventions targeting substance use related outcomes among adolescents aged 10-19, were published in English, and were conducted in the United States, Canada, or Australia. Studies focused on treatment or diagnosed substance use disorders were excluded. Two independent reviewers screened articles, and data were charted using a standardized form. The search identified 24,617 records, of which 71 studies met inclusion criteria. Studies varied widely in sample size, design, and intervention characteristics and were conducted primarily in the United States, with additional studies from Australia and followed by Canada. Most interventions were school-based, followed by digital, media-based, community-based, and policy-level approaches, with fewer hospital- and parent-based programs. Interventions most commonly targeted general substance use or e-cigarette use. Many interventions demonstrated improvements in knowledge, attitudes, risk perception, and refusal skills, while effects on substance use behaviours were mixed and varied by intervention type and substance. School-based interventions were prominent and show promise for improving knowledge and attitudes, but evidence for sustained behavioural change is limited. Future research should emphasize long-term outcomes and further evaluate emerging digital and policy-level strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42400725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.