Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400649›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

The development of an optimal learning strategy for high-similarity categories: the effect of example sequence on children's category learning.

Xiaoxiao Dong, Jiawei Wang, Qiang Xing

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaoxiao DongSchool of Education, Guangzhou University, No. 230, Waihuan Street, Guangzhou city , Guangdong, 510006, China.
Jiawei WangShenzhen University of Information Technology, No. 2188, Longxiang Road, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Qiang XingSchool of Education, Guangzhou University, No. 230, Waihuan Street, Guangzhou city , Guangdong, 510006, China. xingqiang@gzhu.edu.cn.

Funding

Graduate Research and Innovation Program of Guangzhou University GZYJ2025004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While prior research has examined the effects of example sequencing on children's category learning, it has largely overlooked the role of self-regulated exemplar sequencing and whether its effectiveness varies across developmental stages. In the present study, we employed a between-subjects design to examine the effects of example sequencing (interleaved, blocked, or self-regulated) on the learning of high-similarity categories in two age groups (10-12 years and 12-14 years; N = 180). Results indicated that interleaved learning outperformed both self-regulated and blocked sequencing in category learning. Moreover, a significant age group × study condition interaction indicated that the advantage of interleaved learning was more pronounced in older children (12-14 years) than in younger children (10-12 years), suggesting that the effectiveness of interleaved sequencing is shaped by developmental factors. Older children also showed stronger category learning and greater flexibility in adjusting between interleaved and blocked strategies during self-regulated learning, whereas younger children showed a steady decline in interleaving over time. Together, these findings highlight the critical role of exemplar sequencing in children's acquisition of high-similarity categories and underscore the importance of developmental factors in shaping the effectiveness of different learning sequences.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentConcept FormationLearningAdolescentAge FactorsChildFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.