Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400630›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Scoping review: artificial intelligence in patient education for scoliosis.

Jonathan Gibson, Chuck Lam, Conor Boylan, Ryan Francis, Ejaz Zaher, Daniel Vickars, Halil Bulut, Morgan Jones

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jonathan GibsonCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. jxg329@student.bham.ac.uk.
Chuck LamCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Conor BoylanLiverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Ryan FrancisCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Ejaz ZaherCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Daniel VickarsUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Halil BulutIstanbul University Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.
Morgan JonesDepartment of Spinal Surgery, Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScoliosis is a prominent and disabling spinal deformity often presenting in adolescence, causing pain and movement dysfunction. Treatment involves repeated surgical interventions to straighten the spine gradually. Due to the invasive nature and natural disease progression, patients require a deep understanding of the condition for optimal engagement in treatment and associated physiotherapy for rehabilitation. The latest method of patient education is the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to offer tailored information to patients with scoliosis. There are currently no reviews assessing the effects of AI tools in patient education in scoliosis.

methodsLiterature searches from PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science yielded a total of 450 papers after duplicates were excluded. These were independently screened by 2 reviewers with conflicts resolved through consensus, resulting in 5 studies for data extraction. Key themes and information were extracted by two reviewers and grouped by similar trends for analysis.

resultsThe 5 included studies were conducted between 2023 and 2025, in the USA and Europe. They predominantly assessed the use of AI chatbots such as ChatGPT and Google Bard to deliver content and FAQ-style information. Most studies assessed readability, perceived usefulness and reliability, and reported high accuracy ratings and user enjoyment. All 5 studies highlighted the promise of AI in scoliosis patient education, but underlined the need for clinician oversight to ensure the accuracy of the information provided and tailoring to individuals to maximise results.

conclusionAI has an emerging and promising role in patient education; however, clinician involvement and integration are paramount to target the relevant information to best benefit patients. Current issues included text which was too complicated for the target audience, a lack of trust in the output and a lack of clinician oversight. Despite this, all 5 studies reported overall positive results for the adoption of AI in patient education in scoliosis.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChatbotsLarge language modelsPatient educationScoliosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.