Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400628›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026

Incidence and predictors of early and late reoperation after primary lumbar spine fusion: a 10-year retrospective cohort study of 1,356 patients.

Moosa Shabbak, Saeed Ehteshami, Seyed Hamidreza Shojaei, Eisa Nazar, Ali Eghbali, Mehdi Karimi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moosa ShabbakMazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Saeed EhteshamiMazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Seyed Hamidreza ShojaeiMazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Eisa NazarMazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Ali EghbaliMazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Mehdi KarimiMazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Islamic Republic of Iran. kariimii.mehdii@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnplanned reoperation remains a major concern following lumbar spinal fusion, yet limited evidence exists on the distinct predictors of early and late revision surgery using long-term competing-risk analyses. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence, timing, etiologies, and independent predictors of reoperation after primary instrumented lumbar fusion over a 10-year follow-up period.

methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, 1,356 adult patients undergoing primary instrumented lumbar fusion between 2014 and 2024 were analyzed. Reoperations were categorized as early (≤ 90 days) or late (> 90 days). Cumulative incidence was estimated using Fine-Gray competing-risk models, accounting for mortality. Multivariable subdistribution hazard regression was used to identify independent predictors of reoperation.

resultsDuring follow-up, 133 patients (9.8%) underwent reoperation. Early revisions were mainly due to infection and acute complications, whereas late revisions were predominantly related to adjacent segment degeneration and pseudoarthrosis. Multilevel fusion, diabetes mellitus, obesity, osteoporosis, and prolonged operative time were independently associated with increased reoperation risk. A significant synergistic interaction between diabetes and obesity was observed.

conclusionReoperation after lumbar fusion demonstrates distinct early and late patterns driven by different mechanisms. Metabolic comorbidities and surgical complexity are key determinants of revision risk, highlighting the importance of risk stratification and perioperative optimization.

Indexed as

Adjacent segment diseaseCompeting risks analysisDiabetes mellitusFine–Gray modelLumbar spinal fusionMultilevel fusionObesityPseudoarthrosisReoperationRevision surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.