Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42400625›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2026

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor PET in indolent and aggressive insulinoma: Diagnostic performance, quantitative differences, and clinical implications.

Junyan Xu, Yun Liang, Xiaoping Xu, Dan Huang, Jie Chen, Shaoli Song

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Junyan XuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yun LiangCenter for Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiaoping XuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Dan HuangDepartment of Pathology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Jie ChenCenter for Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China. chen0jie@hotmail.com.
Shaoli SongDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, 200032, China. shaoli-song@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2544-7522

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the diagnostic performance, quantitative characteristics, and clinical implications of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor (GLP-1R) PET using

methodsIn this prospective study, patients presenting with hypoglycemia and fulfilling Whipple's triad were enrolled. All patients underwent

resultsNinety-six patients with suspected insulinoma were enrolled in this study (64 indolent, 25 aggressive insulinomas, and 7 non-insulinomas). For indolent insulinomas,

conclusionGLP-1R PET provides excellent diagnostic accuracy for indolent insulinomas but has reduced sensitivity in aggressive disease. In contrast, somatostatin receptor PET/CT is more effective for detecting aggressive tumors. GLP-1R-positive tumor burden may serve as a potential imaging biomarker for hypoglycemia control, supporting the complementary roles of these modalities in insulinoma management.

Indexed as

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorInsulinomaPancreatic NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAdultAgedExenatideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganometallic CompoundsExenatideGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorOrganometallic Compounds68Ga-exendin-4Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptorInsulinomaPET/CT

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.