ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026
Togetherness in Couples Living With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Interpretive Interview Study.
Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo explore how persons with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and partners experience illness-related changes in shared everyday life and intimacy, and how these changes affect well-being.
designAn interpretive phenomenological interview study.
methodsIndividual, in-depth telephone interviews were conducted with persons with moderate to very severe COPD and partners recruited through a survey. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by hermeneutic phenomenology.
resultsTen persons with COPD and five partners were included. One overarching theme was generated: Togetherness in light and darkness-transformation of couplehood when living with COPD, and three interrelated themes: (1) Living in sync and out of step-breathlessness slowed everyday life and limited shared activities and physical intimacy; (2) Holding on and holding back-togetherness was nurtured through emotional presence and challenged by protective restraint; (3) Becoming another we-meaning and continuity were sought amid loss, and shared identity was renewed or faded.
conclusionCOPD transformed couplehood and intimacy, creating risks of disconnection while also opening possibilities for renewal and strengthened belonging. Breathlessness disrupted shared life, roles and identity; however, aligning pace and emotional presence fostered togetherness and well-being for both partners. IMPLICATIONS FOR PATIENT CARE: The findings may guide nurses to initiate and navigate conversations about how COPD affects shared activities, intimacy and emotional connection, thereby facilitating couple-centred care. IMPACT: Relationship and intimacy changes in couples living with COPD remain largely overlooked. This study provides new insights into how breathlessness slows and reshapes shared everyday life, connection, and couple identity, highlighting aspects of well-being that may otherwise remain unaddressed in clinical encounters. REPORTING
methodSRQR. PATIENT AND PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Preliminary interviews with six participants refined the study focus from sexual health toward changes in shared everyday life and intimacy, and informed study design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.